Gauhati High Court Allows For Restoration of Cancelled GST Number:

The Gauhati High Court has directed the authorities to consider restoration of registration if the taxpayer complies with the requirements prescribed under Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Assessee can Seek Restoration by Furnishing Pending Returns and Clearing Tax Dues, Interest and Late Fee

Gauhati High Court Allows For Restoration of Cancelled GST Number
The Gauhati High Court has held that cancellation of GST registration due to continuous non-filing of returns does not permanently deprive a taxpayer from carrying on business and directed the authorities to restore the registration if the taxpayer fulfils the statutory compliance.
The petitioner, Sri Pankaj Kr Agarwal, is the proprietor of Geeta Construction Products and had challenged the order dated 17 March 2023 passed by the Superintendent, CGST, Tinsukia-1 Range, whereby his GST registration bearing No. 18ALFPA6362B1ZJ was cancelled on account of non-filing of GST returns for a period of six months.
According to the petitioner, there were some financial difficulties that prevented him from filing the statutory returns. He pleaded that all pending returns had been furnished and defaults had been corrected up to March 2023. The petitioner also expressed willingness to comply with the requirements contained in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
The Court referred to Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, in which it has been provided that the proper officer can cancel registration in cases where returns are not furnished for a continuous period of six months. The Court also referred to Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017, and the proviso to sub-rule (4), which enunciates that where a registered person furnishes all pending returns and makes payment of tax dues together with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and pass an order in Form GST REG-20.
After observing the legal position, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the concerned authority within sixty days seeking restoration of the GST registration. The Court further directed that if the petitioner submits the application and fulfils all conditions prescribed under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the competent authority shall consider the request for restoration in accordance with law and take necessary steps expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
132My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Cost of Acquisition Cannot Be Taken as Nil Merely Because Old Records Are UnavailablePremium
- ITAT Holds Miscommunication Between Assessee and Counsel As Sufficient to Warrant Fresh Adjudication Premium
- ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Received by Co-operative Society from MembersPremium
- ITAT Holds Deposits in Foreign Companies’ Bank Accounts Cannot Be Taxed as Shareholder’s Unexplained Money Premium
- ITAT Upholds Taxation of Academic Consultancy Income under Section 44ADA Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts









