Gauhati High Court Allows For Restoration of Cancelled GST Number:

The Gauhati High Court has directed the authorities to consider restoration of registration if the taxpayer complies with the requirements prescribed under Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Assessee can Seek Restoration by Furnishing Pending Returns and Clearing Tax Dues, Interest and Late Fee

Gauhati High Court Allows For Restoration of Cancelled GST Number
The Gauhati High Court has held that cancellation of GST registration due to continuous non-filing of returns does not permanently deprive a taxpayer from carrying on business and directed the authorities to restore the registration if the taxpayer fulfils the statutory compliance.
The petitioner, Sri Pankaj Kr Agarwal, is the proprietor of Geeta Construction Products and had challenged the order dated 17 March 2023 passed by the Superintendent, CGST, Tinsukia-1 Range, whereby his GST registration bearing No. 18ALFPA6362B1ZJ was cancelled on account of non-filing of GST returns for a period of six months.
According to the petitioner, there were some financial difficulties that prevented him from filing the statutory returns. He pleaded that all pending returns had been furnished and defaults had been corrected up to March 2023. The petitioner also expressed willingness to comply with the requirements contained in the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
The Court referred to Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, in which it has been provided that the proper officer can cancel registration in cases where returns are not furnished for a continuous period of six months. The Court also referred to Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017, and the proviso to sub-rule (4), which enunciates that where a registered person furnishes all pending returns and makes payment of tax dues together with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and pass an order in Form GST REG-20.
After observing the legal position, the Court directed the petitioner to approach the concerned authority within sixty days seeking restoration of the GST registration. The Court further directed that if the petitioner submits the application and fulfils all conditions prescribed under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the competent authority shall consider the request for restoration in accordance with law and take necessary steps expeditiously. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of.
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
306My Recent Articles
- ITAT Pune Holds Digital Marketing and IT Expenses as Revenue ExpenditurePremium
- ITAT Pune Upholds Company's Depreciation on Goodwill and ESOP Expense DeductionPremium
- ITAT Holds Interest Income from Co-operative Bank Investments Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(d)Premium
- ITAT Holds Notice Issued After 31 March 2022 As Beyond Six-Year Limitation PeriodPremium
- ITAT Pune Allows Higher Section 80P Deduction on Enhanced Business Profits of Cooperative SocietyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







