Gifts Received by Relatives Not Taxable u/s 56(2) (vii): ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Order:

Gifts Received by Relatives Not Taxable u/s 56(2) (vii): ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Order

The CIT(A) observed that gifts received from "relatives" (as per section 56(2)(vii) of the Act) are exempt in the hands of the assessee under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.

ITAT Rules on Taxability of Cash Gift Received From Relatives

authorNidhidateFeb 24, 2026
Last update on Feb 24, 2026
Gifts Received by Relatives Not Taxable u/s 56(2) (vii): ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Order The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata, upheld the CIT(A) order in a case involving the receipt of cash gifts from a brother-in-law. The Tribunal upheld that cash gifts received from relatives are not taxable under section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Partially Upholds Cash Gift Additions, Deletes Credit Card and Agricultural Land Sale Additions
The assessee, Mira Bibi, received two gifts in cash from each of her two brothers-in-law. The gift of Rs 75 lakh was received from Mojibur Rahaman Biswas, and Rs 46 lakh was received from Latifuddin. Since the gifts were received in cash and no gift deed was submitted by the assessee, the AO treated Rs 1,21,00,000 as unexplained cash credits under section 68 read with section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. However, during the assessment proceeding, the assessee provided full details of both donors. She submitted their confirmations, PAN, income tax returns (ITR), financial statements, and balance sheets reflecting such gifts to the assessee.
ITAT Deletes Penalty Where Bogus Purchase Addition Based on Estimated Profit
The CIT(A), after considering these submissions of the assessee, recorded a finding that the donors had sufficient income and financial capacity to give the gifts. The CIT(A) observed that gifts received from "relatives" (as per section 56(2)(vii) of the Act) are exempt in the hands of the assessee under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the assessing officer. The Tribunal agreed with this view. It upheld the findings of CIT(A) and rejected the revenue's appeal. As a result, the addition of Rs 1.21 crore was deleted.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…