GST Dept Reduces Penalty Imposed on Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) from Rs 36.14 Crore to Rs 7.57 Crore:

The CGST and Central Excise Commissionerate reduced the penalty from Rs 36.14 crore to Rs 7.57 crore levied on Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) over irregular or ineligible CENVAT credit availment.
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Secures Major Relief in Ineligible CENVAT credit Availment Case

GST Dept Reduces Penalty Imposed on Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) from Rs 36.14 Crore to Rs 7.57 Crore
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited has disclosed that it has received an Order dated June 23, 2026, from the office of the Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate.
As per the disclosure, the said order has been issued under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, which has reduced the previously levied penalty on the company from Rs 36.14 crore to Rs 7.57 crore, along with tax and interest as applicable.
The company had received the order on June 24, 2026, at 10:27 AM. The company was alleged to have availed irregular or ineligible CENVAT credit during the financial years 2009-10 to 2011-12.
It has been clarified that the impact of the present action on the company's financial, operational and business activities is limited to the extent of the tax, interest and penalty imposed.
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited has informed the aforementioned information to the stock exchanges of India, comprising the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) Limited, under Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”) and SEBI Master Circular no. SEBI/HO/CFD/CFD-PoD-1/P/CIR/2023/123 dated January 30, 2026, via an Intimation dated June 24, 2026.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2447My Recent Articles
- ITAT Upholds Section 148 Reopening But Restricts Rs 30 Lakh Accommodation Entry Addition To 5%, Cites Double TaxationPremium
- Claiming Full TDS Credit Without Reporting Entire Income Is Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Premium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 7.03 Crore Reassessment, Holds AO Cannot Make Additions Beyond Recorded Reasons for ReopeningPremium
- ITAT Condones 650-Day Delay in Matter of Unexplained Cash Deposits During Specified Bank Notes PeriodPremium
- ITAT Quashed Reassessment Proceedings as Section 148 Notices Issued Beyond Statutory Time LimitPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









