GST: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Based on Post-Notification Filing Date; Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular:

GST: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Based on Post-Notification Filing Date; Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular

The court held that refund application for periods before 18.07.2022 cannot be denied just because the application was filed after that date.

Gujarat HC Allows Company to Claim Accumulated ITC Refund Denied Earlier

authorNidhidateJul 24, 2025
Last update on Jul 24, 2025
GST: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Based on Post-Notification Filing Date; Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular The Gujarat High Court, in a recent ruling, has allowed the petitioner company to avail the accumulated ITC due to inverted tariff structure, which was earlier rejected by the tax authority. The petitioner company, Kush Proteins, manufactures and trades edible oil, cattle feed, palmolein oil, mustard oil, etc. The raw materials for manufacturing the products attracted a higher rate of tax under the Customs Tariff Act. Therefore, the petitioner has always claimed accumulation of Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to inverted tariff structure. This structure happens when the import tariff on raw materials or inputs is higher than the tariff on the finished products. Section 54(3) of the CGST Act allows the claim of such refund of accumulated ITC.
GST: High Court Restores Time-Barred Appeal, Condones Delay Upon Establishing Sufficient Cause
When the company applied for refund under section 54(3), their refund applications, filed in January 2023 for periods before 18/07/2022, were rejected by the Tax officer in order dated 31.03.2023. The tax authority referred to Notification No. 9/2022 dated 13.07.2022, which stated the products of the petitioner company were not eligible for refund of ITC. However, this notification was applicable from 18.07.2022, and the petitioner had filed an application for the period before 18/07/2022. The company also filed an appeal to challenge this order before the appellate authority, but this appeal was rejected by the authority in an order dated 29.2.2024. Therefore, the company approached the High Court to challenge both orders. The company argued that the petitioner had filed applications for the refund within 2 years, which is the specified period under Section 54(1) of CGST Act. Additionally, the notification was made applicable from 18.07.2022, and the company was eligible to claim the refund of accumulated ITC for the period up to 17.07.2022. The GST department rejecting such a claim is against the law, and therefore, this order must be quashed.
Income Tax: CBDT Notifies Puducherry Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board for Exemption u/s 10(46)
The High Court of Gujarat observed the decision passed in the Ascent Meditech(Supra), which stated that refund application for periods before 18.07.2022 cannot be denied just because the application was filed after that date. The court also observed that this issue was already decided in the case of Patanjali Foods Ltd. Versus Union Of India & Ors., where the High Court ruled in favour of the petitioner and allowed it to claim the refund. The order dated 31.3.2023 in the refund application and the order dated 29.2.2024 were illegal and unsustainable, and therefore, both orders were quashed by the High Court.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…