GST: Madras High Court Quashes Assessment for FY 2017‑18; Allows Fresh Adjudication:

HC Quashes Assessment For FY 2017-18, allows the petitioner to file fresh Adjudication within 30 days, if fails the respondent will be given liberty to pass fresh orders.
High Court Quashes Order, Provided Company Deposits 25% Disputed Tax

GST: Madras High Court Quashes Assessment for FY 2017‑18; Allows Fresh Adjudication
The Tvl. Annamalaiar Mills Private Limited (petitioner) has filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified call for records concerning challenged order passed by The Deputy State Tax Officer (respondent) dated 14/12/2023 and to quash the same as it is illegal, without jurisdiction and in gross violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and to instruct the respondent to re-apply the assessment afresh after giving an opportunity for a Personal Hearing as per the provisions of the GST Act.
Before the Madras High Court, the petitioner is against the challenged order wherein the demand has been confirmed for the tax period of 2017-18. The challenged order has been introduced the notice in DRC 01A, dated 27/09/2023 and 28/09/2023 and three personal hearing notices dated 02/11/2023, 20/11/2023 and 29/11/2023. But the petitioner has not responded to the same and therefore, the demand has been confirmed against the petitioner.
The Madras High Court has noticed that in similar cases the court has come to rescue the persons like petitioners by quashing the challenged order on terms and say that there are no other cases to take a different view of the matter.
Considering the same, this Writ Petition is disposed by quashing the challenged order on the condition of the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
The Court orders the petitioner to file an answer to the notice in DRC 01 dated 28/09/2023 by treating the challenged order as an attachment to the Show Cause Notice. If the petitioner fails to satisfy the abovementioned details, then the respondent will be given liberty to pass fresh orders on facts and according to the law (Writ Petition) and dismiss as quickly as possible within a specific three months of time, after hearing the petitioner.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1561My Recent Articles
- FSSAI Issues 9 Notices to Swiggy Instamart Over Food Safety Complaints
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Prove Rs 7.38 Crore Cash Deposits as Business ReceiptsPremium
- ITAT Denies Section 54 Exemption Claim Made During Reassessment, Upholds LTCG AdditionPremium
- ITAT Upholds Tax Recognition of Dayabhaga HUF, Deletes Rs 27.40 Lakh AdditionPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 54.03 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition, Cites Lack of EvidencePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








