GST; Online Rummy Games Played are not Taxable as Betting and Gambling: HC

Karnataka HC has rejected GST Intimation Notice to amount of Rs. 21,000 Crore.

GST on Online Gaming

Reetu | May 18, 2023 |

GST; Online Rummy Games Played are not Taxable as Betting and Gambling: HC

GST; Online Rummy Games Played are not Taxable as Betting and Gambling: HC

The Karnataka High Court has rejected the GST Intimation Notice to the amount of Rs.21,000 crore, stating that online/electronic/digital Rummy games and other online/electronic/digital games played on Gameskraft’s platforms are not taxable as “betting” and “gambling.”

The bench of Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar has ruled that online, electronic, and digital games, which are primarily and predominately games of skill rather than chance, are not gambling.

The question was whether offline or online games like Rummy, which are primarily focused on skill rather than chance and can be played with or without stakes, constituted “gambling or betting,” as defined in Entry 6 of Schedule III of the Goods and Services Act, 2017.

Gameskraft Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (GTPL) is an online intermediary firm founded in June 2017 that operates technological platforms that allow players to compete in skill-based online games. The petitioner has over 10 lakh users from all across India, is based in Bangalore, and is GST registered.

The department has issued a Show Cause Notice to the petitioner and its founders in accordance with Section 74(1) of the CGST Act.

The department issued an Intimation Notice under Section 74(5) of the CGST Act, requiring GTPL to deposit Rs. 2,09,89,31,31,501 in addition to interest and penalties.

The petitioner stated that the cash given by participants to the prize pool are simply kept in trust and that the firms have no title, lien, or interest in them because the entities only collect a service fee (on which GST is paid) for the service performed. The entities concerned have made no delivery of goods or made any legal claims. As of now, the total income of the sector is not INR 21,000 crore. As a result, taxing only one business over INR 21,000 crore through the SCN is ludicrous.

The court ruled that the terms “betting” and “gambling” in Entry 6 of Schedule III of the CGST Act must be interpreted in the same way that they have been in the context of Entry 34 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and the Public Gambling Act, 1867. As a result, the phrases “betting” and “gambling” contained in Entry 6 of Schedule III of the CGST Act do not and cannot encompass games of skill.

For Official Order Download PDF Given Below:

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
GST summons issued to Online Gaming Companies for Cashbacks Offered to Players CBIC issues 16 Circulars on issues taken in 53rd GST Council Meeting Download complete Income Tax Act as amended by Finance Act, 2024 ITR Filing Season: What issues Taxpayers are facing on the IT Portal? Budget 2024: Will Deduction of Section 80C under Old Tax Regime be increased by Government?View All Posts