Gujarat HC grants regular bail to assessee arrested for offences punishable under Section 132(1)(a) of the CGST Act

Gujarat HC grants regular bail to assessee arrested for offences punishable under Section 132(1)(a) of the CGST Act The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court, i…

- The Applicant has taken benefit of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017, after intimating the Department vide communication dated September 22, 2017, which was acknowledged by the Department on June 17, 2020 to the effect that the name of the Company has been wrongly shown as a brand name and that the Company has decided to forego its rights over the brand name. Thus, the product manufactured and processed by the Applicant are covered as exempted goods. Also, the returns were filed, which were also audited.
- Whether or not the registered trademark has been foregone and whether or not the Applicant has mislead the authority would be a matter adjudication. The Applicant is reported to have deposited a sum of ₹ 75 Lacs during the course of investigation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court found it to be a fit case where discretion could be exercised in favour of the Applicant.
- The Applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the order dated October 29, 2020 passed by the Respondent No. 2, on executing a personal bond of ₹15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
(d) not leave India without prior permission of the concerned trial court;
(e) furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the concerned trial court;
- Directed the Authorities to adhere to its own Circular relating to COVID-19 and, thereafter, will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case.
“Punishment for certain offences-
132. (1) Whoever commits, or causes to commit and retain the benefits arising out of, any of the following offences, namely:-
(a) supplies any goods or services or both without issue of any invoice, in violation of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, with the intention to evade tax;
shall be punishable––
(i) in cases where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or the amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds five hundred lakh rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine;
(ii) in cases where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or the amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds two hundred lakh rupees but does not exceed five hundred lakh rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine;
(iii) in the case of any other offence where the amount of tax evaded or the amount of input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised or the amount of refund wrongly taken exceeds one hundred lakh rupees but does not exceed two hundred lakh rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine;
(iv) in cases where he commits or abets the commission of an offence specified in clause (f) or clause (g) or clause (j), he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine or with both.”
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts










