HC Grants Major Relief in MKDKY Claim Rejection Case; Says Delay Reason Should be Fairly Examined:

The Allahabad HC says the claim for the MKDKY scheme is beyond the 75 days time limit; in that case the concerned authorities fairly examine the delay reason.
HC Says 75-day Time Timit to Claim for MKDKY Scheme is Limited

HC Grants Major Relief in MKDKY Claim Rejection Case; Says Delay Reason Should be Fairly Examined
The Allahabad High Court says that the 75-day time limit to make a claim for the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana is limited; it should be at least three years. Further, it ruled that if a delay is made in making a claim for the said scheme, in that case, the concerned authorities should check if the delay is reasonable and thereafter take the final decision.
The Allahabad High Court has delivered a significant judgement in a writ petition filed by Deepa Sharama (petitioner) against the State Of U.P and Others (respondents), challenging an order dated September 26, 2024, through which the petitioner's claim for the Mukhymantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana was cancelled on account of being filed late beyond the statutory time limit of 75 days.
When the court heard the case, it referenced its own ruling in the case titled Gautam Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others, where it had ruled that the time limit of 75 days to claim the said scheme is extremely unjustified and unfair. The limit should be at least for three years. Additionally, the scheme does not mention any implications for those who fail to make the claim within the time limit of 75 days. The court says that the scheme is beneficial in nature and aims to support affected individuals. However, the time limit to apply for it is extremely limited. In such a case, if the applicant provides a valid reason behind the delay, then the claim should be examined fairly.
The court noted that the concerned authorities had denied the petitioner's claim without properly considering her explanation for the delay. Hence, finding the rejection unjustified, the court set aside the impugned order dated September 26, 2024. The concerned authorities have been directed to give the petitioner a chance of hearing and, thereafter, issue the final reasonable order within the time period of eight weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2390My Recent Articles
- ICAI Denies Viral Data Breach Rumours, Assures Students and Members of Complete Data Safety
- ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not ExaminedPremium
- ITAT Remands Transfer Pricing Dispute: DRP to Reassess Comparables and Working Capital AdjustmentPremium
- CBDT Notifies TDS Exemption on Aircraft Lease Payments to IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction Scheme Premium
- CBDT Grants TDS Exemption On Ship Leasing Payments To IFSC Units Under 20-Year Tax Deduction SchemePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








