High Court Condones Four-Day Delay in E-Verification; Restores Co-operative Society’s Section 80P Claim

High Court quashes rejection under Section 119(2)(b), holding that a minor, bona fide delay in e-verification should not deny a co-operative society’s 80P deduction.

HC Restores Co-operative Society’s Section 80P Claim

Meetu Kumari | Dec 9, 2025 |

High Court Condones Four-Day Delay in E-Verification; Restores Co-operative Society’s Section 80P Claim

High Court Condones Four-Day Delay in E-Verification; Restores Co-operative Society’s Section 80P Claim

Shri Padmavati Sharafi Sahkari Mandali Ltd., a registered co-operative society entitled to claim deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, filed its return for AY 2022-23 on 08.10.2022. Under the amended regime effective from 01.08.2022, the e-verification window was reduced from 120 days to 30 days.  The society was required to complete e-verification by 07.11.2022. However, verification was completed only four days late.

Because of this delay, the CPC processed the return under Section 143(1)(a) and disallowed the Section 80P claim, raising a demand of Rs. 11 lakh. The society filed an application before the Chief Commissioner under Section 119(2)(b), seeking condonation of delay. The Chief Commissioner rejected the application on 25.09.2024. The society challenged this order before the High Court.

Central Issue: Whether a four-day delay in e-verification, caused by a bona fide misunderstanding of the revised time limit, constitutes “genuine hardship” warranting condonation under Section 119(2)(b).

HC Decided: The High Court quashed the rejection order and allowed the writ petition. It held that the explanation offered by the society was convincing and reflected a genuine and bona fide belief that the earlier 120-day period for e-verification was still in force. The Court observed that such a minor, unintentional delay, arising from a clerical and procedural misunderstanding, should not deprive a co-operative society of a substantive statutory deduction under Section 80P.

The Court therefore set aside the impugned order and directed the Department to pass a fresh order within four weeks, in accordance with the observations recorded.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
30-Month Delay in ITR Filing Not Condonable; Director Disputes No Excuse for Ignoring Statutory Deadlines, Says HC ICAI Drops Misconduct Case Against CA Over Chinese Director’s Appointment Certification HC Upholds Prosecution Sanctions: Large-Scale Tax Evasion Cases Need No Collegium Approval, Says Court ICAI Disciplinary Committee Acquits CA of Misconduct Allegations in Audit of Coaching Institute SC Stays GST Proceedings: Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 Lacks Material ParticularsView All Posts