ROC Levies Penalty on Company and Director for Non-Compliance in Securities Allotment Rules:

ROC imposed a penalty for failing to attach a registered valuer’s report while filing PAS-3 for securities allotment, in violation of Section 39 and Rule 12(5) of the Companies Rules.
Negligence in CCD Allotment Compliance Attracts Penalty

ROC Levies Penalty on Company and Director for Non-Compliance in Securities Allotment Rules
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Pune, has issued an order of adjudication dated February 03, 2026, imposing a penalty amounting to Rs. 1 lakh on a company named Arcatron Mobility Private Limited and its director, under Section 454 of the Companies Act 2013.
The company in default had voluntarily filed an application acknowledging the mistake committed by it and sought adjudication of a penalty under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, for violating provisions of Section 39 of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 12 (5) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014.
In the application, the company asserted that during the course of due diligence, the management, while raising the funds by way of issue and allotment of shares and securities, had realised that it had violated the provisions of Rule 12 (5) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, concerning 150,000 Compulsorily Convertible Debentures issued by the company on September 27, 2019, in conclusion to which the company had furnished Form PAS-3 vide SRN H96214952 dated September 27, 2019.
As per Rule 12 (5) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, the company was required to attach the report of the registered valuer; however, the company failed at the same. In addition to all this, the company also accepted that whatever mistake happened was not committed deliberately; all was due to their negligence.
Since the company had itself admitted the violation committed by it, considering the same, the office held the company and its directors liable for penal action under Section 39 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013, and imposed a penalty amounting to Rs. 50,000 on the company, Arcatron Mobility Private Limited, and Rs. 50,000 on one of its directors named Ganesh Sharad Sonawane. Additionally, they were awarded a time of 90 days to pay the levied penalty and rectify the aforementioned default.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








