High Court Quashes Income Tax Notices Issued Beyond 10-Year Limit Under Section 153C:

Tax Authorities Cannot Reach Back More Than a Decade for Search-Related Assessments
AAR: No GST Registration in Rajasthan for UP-Based Works Contractor

High Court Quashes Income Tax Notices Issued Beyond 10-Year Limit Under Section 153C
Siddhi Vinayak Cement Private Limited was incorporated in March 2008 and later received various funds through loans and share applications, which were used to purchase land. In October 2011, Nirma Limited (the petitioner) acquired all shares of this company. Several years later, on March 6, 2018, the Income Tax department conducted a search on the "SSS Group," where they allegedly found incriminating documents involving a third party.
Thereafter, on March 31, 2022, the tax authorities issued notices under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act to Nirma Limited for the Assessment Years 2008-09 to 2018-19. The petitioner challenged these notices arguing that they were barred by the statute of limitations.
Main Issue: Whether the notices issued under Section 153C for Assessment Years 2008-09 to 2011-12 were legally valid given they were initiated more than ten years after the relevant period, based on the date the seized material was handed over to the petitioner's Assessing Officer.
HC's Order: The High Court ruled in favor of Nirma Limited, quashing the contested notices for the Assessment Years 2008-09 through 2011-12. Relying on CIT vs. Jasjit Singh, the court clarified that for Section 153C proceedings, the limitation period is calculated from the date the seized documents are actually handed over to the Assessing Officer of the "other person"
As the handing over occurred in March 2022, the tax department could only legally initiate proceedings for the Assessment Year 2012-13 onwards.
The court emphasized that allowing the revenue to "relate back" to the original search date would unfairly force taxpayers to preserve records far beyond the legal requirement, creating "disastrous and harsh consequences" not intended by Parliament.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2239My Recent Articles
- High Court Upholds GST Order Issued Within Limitation Despite Next-Day Portal UploadPremium
- ITAT Restricts Bogus Purchase Addition to Profit Element, Deletes Loan AdditionPremium
- High Court Grants Liberty to Challenge GST Tax Demand Before Seeking Registration RevocationPremium
- High Court Denies Bail in Alleged Cyber Fraud and Crypto Transaction CasePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 54F Relief Without Completion Certificate for New House ConstructionPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








