High Court Refuses to De-freeze Bank Accounts Linked to Online Gaming Fraud:

High Court Refuses to De-freeze Bank Accounts Linked to Online Gaming Fraud

Investigation into Rs. 35,000 plus Payouts Reveals Lack of Due Diligence by Payment Platform

High Court Dismisses Buckbox Infotech’s Plea to De-freeze Bank Accounts

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 6, 2026
Last update on Mar 6, 2026
High Court Refuses to De-freeze Bank Accounts Linked to Online Gaming Fraud The petitioner, Buckbox Infotech Private Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking to de-freeze its bank accounts which were blocked by the Director General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). The investigation revealed that the petitioner’s platform was allegedly used for illegal online gaming and betting activities by an entity named "Digihub." It was found that over 35,064 bank accounts received payouts through the petitioner’s platform.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The authorities alleged that these transactions resulted in a significant loss of Government revenue. The petitioner argued that they had an undertaking from Digihub regarding the legality of the business and were merely a service provider. Main Issue: Whether the High Court should exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to de-freeze the bank accounts of a payment intermediary when an investigation into a massive online gaming and betting scam is still in progress. HC's Decision: The High Court dismissed the writ petition and refused to de-freeze the accounts. The Division Bench observed that the petitioner failed to perform basic due diligence on "Digihub" and exclusively relied on a mere undertaking.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Court noted the petitioner did not verify the actual nature of the business through websites or invoices. As the transactions involved over 35,000 accounts and the fact that the investigation was still at a critical stage of analyzing dubious fund flows, the Court held that judicial interference was not warranted. The Rule was discharged without any order as to costs. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264
Up Next

Loading suggestions…