High Court Rules CBDT’s Settlement Cut-Off Date Ultra Vires; Orders Reconsideration:

High Court Rules CBDT’s Settlement Cut-Off Date Ultra Vires; Orders Reconsideration

CBDT circular limiting settlement eligibility to notices issued before 31.03.2021 held ultra vires by HC

High Court Held Applications Filed Before Sept 30 Must Be Considered on Merits

authorMeetu KumaridateJun 24, 2025
Last update on Jun 24, 2025
High Court Rules CBDT’s Settlement Cut-Off Date Ultra Vires; Orders Reconsideration In recent developments, the respondents (assessees) were charitable trusts that submitted applications to the interim board for settlement under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act during the extension period provided, which ended on September 30, 2021. Although search proceedings were started before March 31, 2021, notices under Section 153A/153C were issued afterwards. Based on a CBDT circular dated 28.09.2021, the Interim Board rejected their applications as “not maintainable,” citing that only cases where notices had been issued on or before 31.03.2021 would be treated as pending. The petitioners contested the rejection before the Hon'ble High Court. The learnt Single Judge decided the matter in favour of the assessees on the condition that the applications be submitted by 30.09.2021 and the search be completed by 31.03.2021. The Revenue went into an intra-court appeal against the said decision, claiming that the applications could not be considered maintainable if the notices were sent after March 31, 2021.
ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Defective & Unsigned Income Tax Notice
Issue Raised: Can the CBDT legally set a cut-off date of 31.03.2021 for issuing notices under Sections 153A/153C and thereby restrict settlement applications filed before 30.09.2021, even though there being no such statutory deadline?
No Hearing, No Justice! HC Strikes Down GST Order on Fake ITC under section 74
HC’s Ruling: The High Court ruled that the CBDT's cut-off date of March 31, 2021, was ultra vires and overturned the orders that had rejected the settlement applications. It decided that CBDT could not use a circular to enforce more statutory requirements. The Court decided that regardless of when the notice was sent, the Interim Board had to consider the application on its merits if it was submitted before September 30, 2021, and the case was still pending under Sections 153A and 153C. The Court mandated that the applications be restored and that the Interim Board consider and rule on them in compliance with the law. To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166
Up Next

Loading suggestions…