ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies:

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies

Holding directorship while auditing group entities held to violate independence norms: ICAI

ICAI Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence While Auditing Group Companies

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 17, 2026
Last update on Feb 17, 2026
ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies A complaint was filed by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, pursuant to its investigation into Vaishnavi Corporate Communications Pvt. Ltd. and group entities. The Respondent, CA Sanjiv Saddy, acted as statutory auditor of Magic Airlines Pvt. Ltd., Leisure Club India Pvt. Ltd., and Maansi Agro Pvt. Ltd. for FYs 2005-06 and 2006-07.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
SFIO alleged that financial statements were approved, adopted and audited on the same day repeatedly, indicating non-compliance with Sections 215(3) and 217(3) of the Companies Act, 1956. Main Issue: Whether the same-day audit and approval of financial statements, along with holding directorships in group companies, amounted to a lack of due diligence and violation of auditor independence under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. Committee's Order: The Disciplinary Committee of the The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held that repeated completion of the entire statutory process in a single day, coupled with the absence of adequate audit working papers, reflected failure to exercise due diligence. The explanation of minimal business activity did not justify such practice.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Committee found that holding directorship in group companies while auditing related entities created structural threats to independence, including self-interest and familiarity threats. Independence must not only exist but also appear to exist. The Respondent was held guilty of Professional and Other Misconduct under Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule and Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Committee exercised powers under Section 21B(3)(a) and ordered that CA Sanjiv Saddy be Reprimanded. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2231
Up Next

Loading suggestions…