ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies

Holding directorship while auditing group entities held to violate independence norms: ICAI

ICAI Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence While Auditing Group Companies

Meetu Kumari | Feb 17, 2026 |

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Compromised Independence in Group Companies

A complaint was filed by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, pursuant to its investigation into Vaishnavi Corporate Communications Pvt. Ltd. and group entities. The Respondent, CA Sanjiv Saddy, acted as statutory auditor of Magic Airlines Pvt. Ltd., Leisure Club India Pvt. Ltd., and Maansi Agro Pvt. Ltd. for FYs 2005-06 and 2006-07.

SFIO alleged that financial statements were approved, adopted and audited on the same day repeatedly, indicating non-compliance with Sections 215(3) and 217(3) of the Companies Act, 1956.

Main Issue: Whether the same-day audit and approval of financial statements, along with holding directorships in group companies, amounted to a lack of due diligence and violation of auditor independence under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

Committee’s Order: The Disciplinary Committee of the The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held that repeated completion of the entire statutory process in a single day, coupled with the absence of adequate audit working papers, reflected failure to exercise due diligence. The explanation of minimal business activity did not justify such practice.

The Committee found that holding directorship in group companies while auditing related entities created structural threats to independence, including self-interest and familiarity threats. Independence must not only exist but also appear to exist. The Respondent was held guilty of Professional and Other Misconduct under Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule and Clause (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Committee exercised powers under Section 21B(3)(a) and ordered that CA Sanjiv Saddy be Reprimanded.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT Remands Rs 6 Crore Section 68 Addition After Finding CIT(A)’s Ex-Parte Order Non-Speaking  ITAT Deletes Rs 33 Lakh Addition, Holds Genuine Sales Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Money Merely on CBIC Information ITAT Deletes Rs 4.13 Crore Addition, Holds Non-Disclosure of Capital in Earlier ITRs Alone Cannot Justify Addition ITAT Denies Section 72A Benefit Where Resulting Company Failed to Issue Shares Delhi HC Issues Notice on Challenge to June 30 GSTAT DeadlineView All Posts