ICAI Holds CA Guilty for Negligence in Auditor Appointment & Certification:

Disciplinary Committee Finds CA Guilty of Misconduct in Audit of Beigh Construction Company
Disciplinary Committee has held CA guilty of professional misconduct for negligence in auditor appointment

ICAI Holds CA Guilty for Negligence in Auditor Appointment & Certification
The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) initiated proceedings against CA Tarun Kumar Khanna after a complaint by Shri Sudhanshu Aggarwal, a Director in M/s Amritanshu Infrastructure & Management Private Limited.
The complainant said that the Respondent had audited the financial statements of M/s Beigh Construction Company Private Limited for the FY 2015-16, which were used to obtain tenders from IRCON International Limited through forged records. Investigation revealed that while the MCA portal showed CA Vikas Marwah as the statutory auditors, the Respondent issued an audit report for the same period without going through the mandatory legal procedures for appointment or verification.
Issue Before ICAI: Whether the Respondent committed professional misconduct by accepting an appointment as a statutory auditor without ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Companies Act regarding casual vacancies and for failing to exercise due diligence in certifying financial statements with significant discrepancies.
Committee's Decision: The Disciplinary Committee held the Respondent GUILTY of Professional and 'Other' Misconduct. He was found liable under Item (9) of Part I of the First Schedule, Item (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule, and Item (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
The Committee observed that the Board made the Respondent's appointment to fill a "casual vacancy" that did not legally exist on the MCA portal at that time. He also failed to verify the resignation of the previous auditor, did not obtain a valid "No Objection Certificate" (NOC), and failed to check his appointment was ratified in a general meeting. The Committee held that the Respondent conducted the audit on an "urgent basis" to help the company submit a tender, leading to the failure in verification of inflated financial figures.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2191My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Section 153C Assessments Without Incriminating Material For Completed YearsPremium
- High Court Upholds DGGI Arrest Despite Prior State GST InvestigationPremium
- ITAT Holds Section 263 Assessment Cannot Survive After Revision Order Is QuashedPremium
- ITAT Allows Section 80P Deduction on Interest From Co-operative BanksPremium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition on Marriage Gift and Household Cash ExplanationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








