Income Tax deduction allowed by Karnataka High Court on loss suffered by assessee on Foreign Rate Fluctuation

  • Home
  • Income Tax deduction allowed by Karnataka High Court on loss suffered by assessee on Foreign Rate Fluctuation

CA Bimal Jain | Nov 18, 2021 | Views 298973

Income Tax deduction allowed by Karnataka High Court on loss suffered by assessee on Foreign Rate Fluctuation

Income Tax deduction allowed by Karnataka High Court on loss suffered by assessee on Foreign Rate Fluctuation

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in P.R Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s United Spirits Ltd. [I.T.A. No. 548/2015 c/w I.T.A No. 37/2010 decided on September 2, 2021] answered in favor of the M/s United Spirits Ltd. (“the Assessee”) and held that the loss suffered by an Assessee on account of foreign exchange difference as on the date of the balance sheet is an item of expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act (“IT Act”) and further allowed the Income Tax deduction (“ITD”) on the loss suffered by an Assessee on account of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation Loss (“FEFL”).

The Assessee claimed an amount of Rs. 1,80,22,000/- towards the FEFL, but was disallowed by assessing officer (“AO”) assuming that the funds raised by the Assessee had been used for certain investments into the share capital of various companies.

Tribunal noted that the Assessee had offered the foreign exchange to tax which had been accepted by the AO, held that the Assessee had established that the loss was in relation to working capital loans and the said loans were not utilized to making the interest as observed by the AO, thus, the said loss was allowed as a deduction.

It was observed, that the interest paid on the loans was allowed by the AO himself as a deduction, however, no loss in connection thereto was allowed. The action of the AO accepting the Foreign Exchange but disallowing the loss appears to be erroneous.

Held that, FEFL suffered by an assessee as on the date of the balance sheet is an item of expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Act.

Ruled, confirming the view of the Tribunal, answered in favor of the Assessee and against the revenue.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

To Read Judgment Download PDF Given Below :

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button

Join Membership

In case of Any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Non-submission of receipt of electricity bill is not a ground of rejection of application for GST registration GST not applicable on payment of notice pay and allowed ITC on canteen services Anticipatory bail is a statutory right and custodial interrogation is neither warranted nor provided under the CGST Act TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer Hon’ble High Court ordered the GST Authority to reimburse GST paid under the incorrect heading View All Posts

Leave a Reply