ITAT Allows Fresh Review of Capital Gains Exemption Claimed Under Section 54F:

ITAT Allows Fresh Review of Capital Gains Exemption Claimed Under Section 54F

Since the factual conditions of Section 54F, such as the timing of investment and quantum of investment, were not verified earlier, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer.

ITAT Partly Allows Appeal in Rs 25.59 lakh STCG Addition

authorNidhidateJan 21, 2026
Last update on Jan 21, 2026
ITAT Allows Fresh Review of Capital Gains Exemption Claimed Under Section 54F The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, remanded the Rs 25.59 lakh short-term capital gains addition back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh verification on the Section 54F exemption claim. The assessee, Dollar Chunilal Modi HUF, sold an immovable property on 01.04.2012 for Rs 35,00,000. The written-down value (WDV) of this property was Rs 9,40,830. The assessee earned capital gains of Rs 25,59,170. The assessee reinvested this capital gain in a residential flat and claimed a deduction under Section 54F.
ITAT Clarifies Form 10B Filing Is Directory, Not Mandatory for Section 11 Exemption; Favours Assessee
However, the AO rejected this exemption and taxed this amount as short-term capital gains just because the deduction claimed by the assessee HUF under section 54F was not made in the original Income Tax Return (ITR) furnished by the assessee. Therefore, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A), which upheld the AO's decision. Therefore, the assessee approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai. The Tribunal held that just the failure to claim the deduction in the original return cannot be the ground to reject the examination of the claim at the appellate stage. The court cited the Supreme Court's previous judgment, which clarified that the section 54E/54F exemption is allowable even if it was claimed towards the capital gains arising from depreciable assets.
ITAT Sets Aside Penalty Levied for Non-Compliance with Notices
However, since the factual conditions of Section 54F, such as the timing of investment and quantum of investment, were not verified earlier, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was directed to verify the claim after giving the assessee a fair opportunity of being heard and then pass a reasoned order.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…