ITAT Bangalore Quashes Section 263 Revision as Assessee Had Not Claimed Alleged Illegal Commission Expenditure:

ITAT Bangalore Quashes Section 263 Revision as Assessee Had Not Claimed Alleged Illegal Commission Expenditure The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore, has held that revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be exercised where the assessee had not claimed the expenditure which was alleged to have been wrongly allowed by the AO The assessee is M/s. Khoday India Limited and had filed its return for assessment year 2020-21 declaring a loss. After a search conducted under Section 132, assessment proceedings under Section 153A were initiated and completed on 31 March 2023. Subsequently, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bengaluru, invoked powers under Section 263 of the Act on the ground that commission expenditure amounting to Rs 18 lakh represented illegal payments and, therefore, was not allowable under Section 37(1). According to the PCIT, the AO had failed to examine the issue during assessment proceedings, which makes the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial. The assessee contended that it had neither made any such payments nor claimed any deduction of the alleged amount. It further submitted that despite repeated requests, the authorities failed to furnish the material relied upon and also denied the opportunity to cross-examine the persons whose statements formed the basis of the proceedings. Before the Tribunal, the Revenue stated that information regarding the alleged payments had emerged during search proceedings conducted in the case of the Tuteja, Bhatia and Dhand Group and that a satisfaction note prepared by the AO formed the basis for initiating revision proceedings. The Tribunal found that neither the Principal Commissioner in the revisionary order nor the Departmental Representative before the Tribunal could demonstrate that the deduction of Rs 18 lakh had in fact been allowed to the assessee. Holding that the existence of such expenditure itself had not been established, the Tribunal observed that there was no basis to conclude that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Accordingly, the Tribunal quashed the order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.