ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments:

ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore, has granted relief to Navi General Insurance Ltd. by deleting disallowances relating to amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D and ESOP expenses claimed under Section 37(1).

ITAT rules that ESOP recharge expenses are deductible

authorSaimadateJun 10, 2026
Last update on Jun 10, 2026
ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore held that where amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D has been accepted in earlier years, the Revenue cannot deny the deduction in a later year without first disturbing the original allowance.
Does Tax Liability End After Death? Know the Rules for Legal Heirs
The assessee Navi General Insurance Limited is in the business of general insurance and filed its return for assessment year 2021-22 declaring a loss. During scrutiny proceedings, the AO disallowed the deduction of Rs.1.73 crore claimed under Section 35D towards amortisation of preliminary expenses. The Department also disallowed ESOP expenditure amounting to Rs.68.95 lakh and share issue expenses of Rs.18.57 lakh.
MP GST Prescribes Virtual Mode as Default for Hearings Under Sections 73, 74, 74A and 107
The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) affirmed the additions, following which the assessee approached the ITAT. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had incurred preliminary expenses amounting to Rs.8.68 crore and had been claiming one-fifth thereof under Section 35D over successive years. The Revenue had sought to deny the deduction only in the fifth year. The court, after referring to the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Subex Ltd v. CIT, held that once the claim had been accepted in the initial years, the Department could not disallow the same in the subsequent year without disturbing the earlier assessments. Accordingly, the disallowance of Rs.1.73 crore under Section 35D was deleted.
UDIN Portal Update: ICAI Revises Categories and Sub-Categories for Future Registrations
With regard to ESOP expenditure, the Tribunal noted that since the expenditure related to the assessee's own employees and had been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business, the Bench held that such reimbursement could not be regarded as a notional expense. However, in respect of share issue expenses amounting to Rs.18.57 lakh, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.

About Author

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
132
Up Next

Loading suggestions…