ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore, has granted relief to Navi General Insurance Ltd. by deleting disallowances relating to amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D and ESOP expenses claimed under Section 37(1).
ITAT rules that ESOP recharge expenses are deductible

ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore held that where amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D has been accepted in earlier years, the Revenue cannot deny the deduction in a later year without first disturbing the original allowance.
The assessee Navi General Insurance Limited is in the business of general insurance and filed its return for assessment year 2021-22 declaring a loss. During scrutiny proceedings, the AO disallowed the deduction of Rs.1.73 crore claimed under Section 35D towards amortisation of preliminary expenses. The Department also disallowed ESOP expenditure amounting to Rs.68.95 lakh and share issue expenses of Rs.18.57 lakh.
The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) affirmed the additions, following which the assessee approached the ITAT.
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had incurred preliminary expenses amounting to Rs.8.68 crore and had been claiming one-fifth thereof under Section 35D over successive years. The Revenue had sought to deny the deduction only in the fifth year. The court, after referring to the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Subex Ltd v. CIT, held that once the claim had been accepted in the initial years, the Department could not disallow the same in the subsequent year without disturbing the earlier assessments. Accordingly, the disallowance of Rs.1.73 crore under Section 35D was deleted.
With regard to ESOP expenditure, the Tribunal noted that since the expenditure related to the assessee's own employees and had been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business, the Bench held that such reimbursement could not be regarded as a notional expense. However, in respect of share issue expenses amounting to Rs.18.57 lakh, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance.
Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
308My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Sale of Transferable Development Rights Taxable as Capital GainsPremium
- ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Adjudication Over Rs 35.50 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Deposit AdditionPremium
- ITAT Pune Holds Digital Marketing and IT Expenses as Revenue ExpenditurePremium
- ITAT Pune Upholds Company's Depreciation on Goodwill and ESOP Expense DeductionPremium
- ITAT Holds Interest Income from Co-operative Bank Investments Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(d)Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







