ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore, has granted relief to Navi General Insurance Ltd. by deleting disallowances relating to amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D and ESOP expenses claimed under Section 37(1).
ITAT rules that ESOP recharge expenses are deductible

ITAT Bangalore Allows Section 35D and Rejects Disallowance Without Disturbing Earlier Assessments
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore held that where amortisation of preliminary expenses under Section 35D has been accepted in earlier years, the Revenue cannot deny the deduction in a later year without first disturbing the original allowance.
The assessee Navi General Insurance Limited is in the business of general insurance and filed its return for assessment year 2021-22 declaring a loss. During scrutiny proceedings, the AO disallowed the deduction of Rs.1.73 crore claimed under Section 35D towards amortisation of preliminary expenses. The Department also disallowed ESOP expenditure amounting to Rs.68.95 lakh and share issue expenses of Rs.18.57 lakh.
The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) affirmed the additions, following which the assessee approached the ITAT.
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had incurred preliminary expenses amounting to Rs.8.68 crore and had been claiming one-fifth thereof under Section 35D over successive years. The Revenue had sought to deny the deduction only in the fifth year. The court, after referring to the decision of the Karnataka High Court in Subex Ltd v. CIT, held that once the claim had been accepted in the initial years, the Department could not disallow the same in the subsequent year without disturbing the earlier assessments. Accordingly, the disallowance of Rs.1.73 crore under Section 35D was deleted.
With regard to ESOP expenditure, the Tribunal noted that since the expenditure related to the assessee's own employees and had been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business, the Bench held that such reimbursement could not be regarded as a notional expense. However, in respect of share issue expenses amounting to Rs.18.57 lakh, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance.
Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
190My Recent Articles
- Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Department Issues New Guidelines for GST Return Scrutiny Under Section 61 of RGST Act, 2017
- ITAT Rules Mutuality Based Club's Liquor Supply to Members Cannot Automatically Trigger Tax Audit PenaltyPremium
- ITAT Rules CIT(E) Cannot Reject Section 12AB And 80G Applications Without Granting Reasonable Opportunity of Being HeardPremium
- ITAT Remands Reassessment Validity Issue to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication After Finance Act 2026 DevelopmentsPremium
- ITAT Deletes DAPE Based Tax Addition And Remits Income Tax Refund Interest Issue to AOPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








