ITAT Deletes Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Supported by Opening Cash Balance and Business Records:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has held that cash deposits made during the demonetisation period cannot be treated as unexplained money merely on the basis of suspicion.
Mere Doubt Cannot Justify Addition under Section 69A

ITAT Deletes Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Supported by Opening Cash Balance and Business Records
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has deleted the addition of Rs 25.70 lakh made under Section 69A and observed that a finding based only on doubt, without any adverse material, is unsustainable.
The assessee is engaged in the wholesale and retail business of milk and filed her return declaring an income of Rs 18.97 lakh. During scrutiny assessment, the AO treated cash deposits of Rs 2.22 crore made during the demonetisation period as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In appeal, the CIT(A) examined additional evidence and a remand report furnished by the AO. On the basis of the material produced, the CIT(A) deleted the addition to the extent of Rs 1.92 crore but sustained an addition of Rs 30.58 lakh that was for deposits made in specified bank notes (SBNs).
The assessee challenged the addition before the ITAT.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee carried on a cash-based milk business and regularly deposited cash collections into the bank for making cheque payments to suppliers. The AO in the remand proceedings had accepted that the assessee maintained cash books and sales records. Also, the pattern of cash deposits during the year was in line with the preceding two years and there was an opening cash balance of Rs 25.70 lakh as of 07 November 2016.
The Tribunal held that when the existence of the opening cash balance had already been verified and accepted during remand proceedings, the addition could not be sustained merely on the basis of suspicion. Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs 2,570,945 made under Section 69A in respect of specified bank notes deposited during the demonetisation period and directed the AO to grant relief to that extent. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
286My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Rs 92 Lakh Capital Gain Addition to CIT(A)Premium
- ITAT Holds Documented Sources Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained InvestmentPremium
- ITAT Upholds 8% Profit Addition on Unrecorded Job Work Transactions Found in Loose PapersPremium
- ITAT Rules Payment Through Banking Channels and Donation Receipt Cannot Establish Genuine DonationPremium
- ITAT Holds Third-Party Loose Papers Are Insufficient Without CorroborationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







