ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Accepts Explained Family Cash Source:

ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Accepts Explained Family Cash Source

ITAT deletes the cash deposit addition, accepting the family source explanation supported by the affidavit and surrounding circumstances.

Plausible Family Explanation Accepted; No Addition Under Section 69A Sustained

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 18, 2026
Last update on Apr 18, 2026
ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Accepts Explained Family Cash Source The assessee, an NRI individual, did not file a return of income for AY 2017-18. Based on information gathered under “Operation Clean Money,” the Assessing Officer noted cash deposits of Rs 14 lakh during the demonetisation period and treated the same as unexplained income under Section 69A.
ITAT Deletes Penalty; Disallowance of Section 54 Claim Not Concealment
During appellate proceedings, part of the addition was deleted, but Rs. 6.7 lakh was sustained on the ground that the assessee failed to establish the source. The assessee contended that the amount represented (i) savings from foreign currency converted for wedding expenses, (ii) cash gifts received during her daughter’s marriage, and (iii) funds originally belonging to her late mother, held by her brother and later handed over. The explanation was supported by an affidavit and surrounding facts. Issue Raised: Whether cash deposits of Rs. 6.7 lakh during the demonetisation period could be treated as unexplained income under Section 69A despite the assessee furnishing a plausible explanation supported by an affidavit and the circumstances.
Ex Parte Assessment Set Aside; Appeal Restored Despite Advance Tax Issue
Tribunal Held: The Tribunal allowed the appeal and deleted the addition. It noted that the assessee had provided a consistent explanation regarding the source of funds, including family savings and wedding-related receipts. The explanation was supported by an affidavit and remained unrebutted by the Revenue. The Tribunal observed that in such peculiar facts where the money was claimed to be family savings of the deceased mother, later handed over for the benefit of grandchildren, the explanation could not be summarily rejected. The absence of contrary evidence from the Revenue further strengthened the assessee’s case. Therefore, the addition made under Section 69A was deleted. To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2200
Up Next

Loading suggestions…