ITAT Deletes R&D Disallowance as AO Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Jurisdiction:

ITAT Deletes R&D Disallowance as AO Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Jurisdiction

The ITAT Chennai holds In-House R&D expenditure under Section 35(2AB) cannot be examined beyond the specific CASS issue.

ITAT Deletes Rs 2.45 Crore Disallowance

authorSaimadateOct 14, 2026
Last update on Oct 14, 2026

AEON Formulations Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in the research and manufacture of pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and ayurceutical products, filed its return for AY 2018–19 declaring a loss of Rs. 82,11,268. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 3,21,66,010 under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act for expenditure incurred on its in-house R&D facility. The case was selected for Limited Scrutiny under the CASS system to examine two issues: duty drawback and deduction on account of donation for scientific research.

Telangana ACB Arrests Tahsildar and Mandal Surveyor for Allegedly Accepting Rs 20 Lakh Bribe for Land Survey in Rangareddy

During assessment proceedings under Section 143(3), the AO examined the assessee’s claim under Section 35(2AB) and relied on Form No. 3CL issued by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR). Based on the eligible R&D expenditure certified in the form, the AO restricted the weighted deduction to Rs. 76.11 lakh and disallowed the balance claim of Rs. 2,45,55,010.

The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance and rejected the assessee’s contention that the AO had exceeded the scope of Limited Scrutiny. The Tribunal held that a donation or contribution to an eligible research institution is materially different from expenditure incurred by a company on its own approved in-house R&D facility. While the former falls under the relevant provisions of Section 35(1), the latter is governed by Section 35(2AB), subject to its applicable conditions. The nature of the transaction, the recipient or beneficiary, and the evidence required to establish eligibility are different.

ICAI Issues New Tender Guidelines for Practising CAs to Prevent Unfair Fee Competition

The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had not claimed any donation or contribution for scientific research under the relevant provisions in Schedule ESR of its return. The amount of Rs. 3,21,66,010 was separately claimed under Section 35(2AB) for its own in-house R&D expenditure.

CBI Court Convicts and Sentences Two Postal Officials in Bribery Case Involving Recurring Deposit Accounts

Accordingly, the fact that both claims fall within the broader framework of Section 35 could not justify treating them as the same issue for Limited Scrutiny purposes. The Tribunal held that Limited Scrutiny is issue-specific and not merely section-specific. Expenditure incurred on an assessee’s own in-house R&D facility under Section 35(2AB) could not be subsumed within the notified issue of donation for scientific research merely because both fall under Section 35.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
540
Up Next

Loading suggestions…