ITAT Deletes Rs 15.77 Crore Disallowance, Holds Business Expediency Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 37(1):
The ITAT Delhi held that once a transaction is covered under a binding APA under Section 92CC, the Revenue cannot disallow the same expenditure under Section 37(1), deleting the Rs 15.77 crore addition.
ITAT Rules Section 37(1) Cannot Override Covered Transactions
Khush Trivedi
Jun 1, 2026Premium
ITAT Deletes Rs 15.77 Crore Disallowance, Holds Business Expediency Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 37(1)
The ITAT Delhi held that once a transaction is covered under a binding APA under Section 92CC, the Revenue cannot disallow the same expenditure under Section 37(1), deleting the Rs 15.77 crore addition.
Also Read
ITAT Quashes Penalty as AO Failed to Validly Initiate Proceedings During AssessmentITAT Holds Mere Suspicion Over Surge in Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Cannot Justify Addition ITAT Quashes Reassessment as AO Makes No Addition on Reopening IssueITAT Restores Case of Suspicious Transactions to CIT(A) After Rule 46A Application and Key Issues Were Not Properly Considered
About Author
Khush Trivedi
Content writer
Study cafe
AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, India
46My Recent Articles
- Taxation of Preliminary Expenses Under the Income Tax Act: Complete Guide to Section 35D
- Selling a Property or Asset? Know These Capital Gains Tax Exemptions
- Taxation of Joint Development Agreements (JDA): Everything Landowners Need to Know
- Section 139(9) Defective Return Notice: Complete Guide to Fixing Your ITR
- Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Depreciation on Business Assets
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts