ITAT Holds Share Capital Addition Unsustainable Where Assessee Furnished ITR:

ITAT Holds Share Capital Addition Unsustainable Where Assessee Furnished ITR

The ITAT Kolkata deleted a Rs 20 lakh addition made under Section 68 towards share application money received from M/s Evergreen Barter Pvt. Ltd.

ITAT Deletes Rs 20 Lakh Section 68 Addition

authorSaimadateSep 28, 2026
Last update on Sep 28, 2026

The appeal was filed by Pax Travels Private Limited against the order of the CIT(A), Kolkata-27, concerning the addition of Rs 20 lakh under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to share application money received from M/s Evergreen Barter Private Limited. During the relevant year, the assessee had raised Rs 1.10 crore as share application or share subscription money from three companies. The assessee had issued 11,000 equity shares at a face value of Rs 10 per share with a premium of Rs 990 per share.

GSTAT Releases Inaugural E-Journal Featuring 20 GST Cases and 7 Anti-Profiteering Cases

The assessee had originally filed its return declaring nil income, which was processed under Section 143(1). Subsequently, the assessment was reopened under Section 147, and notice under Section 148 was issued. However, the AO treated the Rs 20 lakh received from Evergreen Barter Pvt. Ltd. as unexplained cash credit under Section 68.

CBI Arrests Key Accused in US$7.21 Million Transnational Cyber Fraud Case

Before the Tribunal, the assessee submitted that M/s Evergreen Barter Pvt. Ltd. had subsequently changed its name to M/s PPJ Heavy Gear Private Limited and was amalgamated with M/s Prabhu Projects Private Limited. The assessee had placed the relevant amalgamation order and corporate records before the authorities.

Best Salary Accounts for Corporate Employees: Zero AMB, Free Debit Card & Cashback

The Tribunal further noted that the records demonstrated that the company concerned existed in the MCA records and that the necessary documents corroborating the receipt of money had been placed before the lower authorities. Therefore, the very basis on which the CIT(A) had sustained the addition was found to be incorrect.

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) on the issue and directed the AO to delete the Rs 20 lakh addition under Section 68.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
476
Up Next

Loading suggestions…