ITAT Hyderabad Sends Back 10(23C) Exemption Matter Over Typographical Error in Approval Order:

Tribunal remands case after noticing that the assessee’s 10(23C)(vi) exemption claim was denied due to a clerical error in Form 10AB approval, directing AO to verify registration and await rectification
ITAT Remands 10(23C) Exemption Case Over Typographical Error in Approval Order

ITAT Hyderabad Sends Back 10(23C) Exemption Matter Over Typographical Error in Approval Order
The assessee, Shri M. Bagareddy Educational Society, filed its return for AY 2023-24, declaring NIL income and claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi). The CPC, while processing the return under Section 143(1), denied the exemption, citing a mismatch in registration details. The assessee had earlier received a provisional 12A registration via Form 10AC, but later applied for regular approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) through Form 10AB.
The CIT (Exemptions) disposed of this application on 31.03.2023; however, due to a typographical error, the approval was wrongly shown as granted under Section 10(23C)(ii), a clause meant for political parties. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, treating the mismatch as a mere error.
Issue Raised: Whether the assessee’s exemption claim under Section 10(23C)(vi) could be allowed when the approval order in Form 10AB mistakenly mentioned Section 10(23C)(ii) due to a typographical error.
Tribunal Ruled: The Tribunal observed that although the assessee had applied for approval under Section 10(23C)(vi), the order issued in Form 10AB mistakenly reflected approval under Section 10(23C)(ii). Since Section 10(23C)(ii) applies to political parties, the mismatch was material and not limited to the URN alone. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had already filed a rectification application before the CIT(E), and until this mistake was corrected, technical discrepancies would continue to affect the exemption claim.
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)’s order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer. The AO was instructed to verify the correct approval details upon rectification by the CIT(E) and then decide the exemption claim in accordance with the law. The revenue’s appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 302-Day Delay, Restores Salary Assessment for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Condones Delay After Tax Consultant's Death, Restores Appeals for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands Salary Addition, Says Taxability Depends on Salary Becoming Due, Not Mere ReceiptPremium
- ITAT Deletes TP Royalty Adjustment, Orders Fresh Review of Commission BenchmarkingPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Unsigned Section 148 Notice Issued to AssesseePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








