ITAT Remands Rs 1.83 Crore Section 10(26AAA) Sikkim Old Settler Tax Exemption Dispute After Condoning 2,027-Day Delay:

ITAT Remands Rs 1.83 Crore Section 10(26AAA) Sikkim Old Settler Tax Exemption Dispute After Condoning 2,027-Day Delay

ITAT condoned a 2,027-day delay and remanded Section 10(26AAA) Sikkim Old Settler exemption dispute for fresh adjudication by the AO.

ITAT Restores Five Appeals to AO

authorSaloni KumaridateSep 29, 2026
Last update on Sep 28, 2026

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata Bench, has remanded the tax exemption dispute of Sunil Kumar Agarwal for Assessment Years (AYs) 2011-12 to 2015-16 to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also condoned a delay of 2,027 days in filing the appeals, finding the reasons given by the assessee to be genuine.

The assessee had declared nil income, claiming exemption under Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act on the ground that he was a resident of Sikkim and an “Old Settler” of the state by birth. However, the AO completed the assessments under Sections 144 and 147 and denied the exemption, making an addition of Rs. 1.83 crore for AY 2011-12. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] subsequently upheld the addition.

CBDT Extends Income Tax Return and Tax Audit Report Filing Deadlines for AY 2026-27

Before the ITAT, the assessee submitted that the issue of eligibility of Old Settlers of Sikkim had been addressed by the Supreme Court and that the Income Tax Act was subsequently amended with retrospective effect from 1990-91. The assessee requested that the matter be sent back to the AO for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision.

The Tribunal noted that a coordinate bench had taken a similar view in the case of Sanjay Kumar Agarwal and had directed the AO to reconsider the matter after applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court concerning Old Settlers of Sikkim.

ITAT Remands Appeal of Unexplained Investments and Loans After CIT(A) Allegedly Overlooked Submitted Evidence

Accordingly, the ITAT restored all five appeals to the AO for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The appeals for AYs 2011-12 to 2015-16 were allowed for statistical purposes.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2826
Up Next

Loading suggestions…