ITAT Restores 12A Registration Application Rejected Ex-Parte:

ITAT Restores 12A Registration Application Rejected Ex-Parte

ITAT condones 41-day delay and sets aside ex-parte rejection of 12A(1)(ac)(iii) registration application; directs CIT(E) to decide afresh within 90 days.

Ex-parte rejection of 12A(1)(ac)(iii) registration set aside; 41-day delay condoned; matter remanded to CIT(E) for fresh adjudication within 90 days.

authorMeetu KumaridateSep 4, 2025
Last update on Sep 4, 2025
ITAT Restores 12A Registration Application Rejected Ex-Parte The appeal was preferred against the order dated 22/10/2024 passed by the Commissioner (Exemptions) in dismissing the assessee's application for regular registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The dismissal was ordered ex-parte since the trust failed to respond to hearing notices posted on the portal. 41 days' delay in filing the appeal was explained by an affidavit of the trustee to the effect that the trust was not familiar with income-tax affairs or running the online portal. Given the short delay and the explanation filed on record, the Tribunal waived the delay. It was contended that there was no intention of non-compliance and that the assessee had a meritorious case. The Departmental Representative relied on the order of the Commissioner (Exemptions).
ITAT Upholds Deletion of Rs. 8,89,36,000 Addition u/s 69C on Cash Withdrawals
Issue Raised: Whether ex-parte rejection of a 12A(1)(ac)(iii) registration application, without granting an effective opportunity of hearing, could be sustained in law.
ITAT Quashes Reopening u/s 147, Declares Assessments Beyond Four Years as Invalid
ITAT’s Decision: The Tribunal observed that the interest of justice would be served if the assessee were granted a proper opportunity. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside and the matter restored to the file of the Commissioner (Exemptions) for fresh adjudication. Directions were issued to grant an adequate opportunity to present the case and to decide the application strictly in accordance with law within 90 days from receipt of the Tribunal’s order. Thus, the appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2158
Up Next

Loading suggestions…