ITAT Rules Taxpayer Should Not Suffer Once Delay in ITR E-Verification is Condoned:

The ITAT Hyderabad Holds that CPC Cannot Continue to Deny Carry Forward of Business Loss After Competent Authority Condones Delay in E-Verification of Return
ITAT Restores Appeal After 497 Day Delay

Premium
ITAT Rules Taxpayer Should Not Suffer Once Delay in ITR E-Verification is Condoned
The ITAT Hyderabad Holds that CPC Cannot Continue to Deny Carry Forward of Business Loss After Competent Authority Condones Delay in E-Verification of Return
Also Read
ITAT Upholds 8% Profit Estimation on Bank Credits Where Assessee Failed to Substantiate Business ReceiptsITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticeITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement Cost
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
135My Recent Articles
- ITAT Upholds 8% Profit Estimation on Bank Credits Where Assessee Failed to Substantiate Business ReceiptsPremium
- ITAT Holds Cash Deposits of Commission Agent Cannot Be Automatically Treated as Unexplained Income under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Holds Cost of Acquisition Cannot Be Taken as Nil Merely Because Old Records Are UnavailablePremium
- ITAT Holds Miscommunication Between Assessee and Counsel As Sufficient to Warrant Fresh Adjudication Premium
- ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Received by Co-operative Society from MembersPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








