ITR Refund Delay Despite Timely Filing: Refunds May Take Till December 2026:

Grievance closure does not guarantee refund as statutory timelines allow processing till December 2026
Income Tax Refund Delays Continue Despite Timely ITR Filing

ITR Refund Delay Despite Timely Filing: Refunds May Take Till December 2026
Filing an income tax return (ITR) within the due date does not necessarily guarantee timely processing or a refund, as reflected in a grievance response recently issued by the Income Tax Department.
In a recent case, the taxpayer had filed the return for FY 2024–25 (AY 2025–26) on time. With no update on processing, a grievance was raised on the income tax portal. While the grievance has since been marked as closed, the return itself continues to remain under processing.
The Department’s reply states that the return “may be processed within nine months from the end of the financial year.” Since the financial year ends on 31 March 2025, this effectively allows processing to continue until December 2026.
Tax professionals point out that closure of a grievance often only confirms that the case falls within statutory timelines and does not imply any acceleration of refund issuance.
The episode has also drawn attention to the unequal treatment of delays. While delayed refunds carry interest at 0.5% per month, taxpayers are charged interest at 1% per month for delays in advance or self-assessment tax payments.
In tax administration, compliance deadlines for taxpayers are rigid, while refund timelines for the department remain significantly more flexible.
Tax professionals point out that closure of a grievance often only confirms that the case falls within statutory timelines and does not imply any acceleration of refund issuance.
The episode has also drawn attention to the unequal treatment of delays. While delayed refunds carry interest at 0.5% per month, taxpayers are charged interest at 1% per month for delays in advance or self-assessment tax payments.
In tax administration, compliance deadlines for taxpayers are rigid, while refund timelines for the department remain significantly more flexible.About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2200My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Contingent Income Cannot Be Taxed Until Enforceable Right To Receive CrystallisesPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning Delay Caused by Senior Citizen’s AccountantPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Order for Denying Assessee Copy of Remand ReportPremium
- High Court Sets Aside Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation for Fresh DecisionPremium
- ITAT Grants BSNL VRS Exemptions Despite Delay, Rejects Technical ObjectionsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








