Assessment Quashed as Time-Barred in Absence of Actual FT&TR Reference: ITAT:

Mere proposal to seek information from Singapore tax authorities does not extend limitation under section 153
Assessment Quashed as Time-Barred for Want of FT&TR Reference: ITAT

Assessment Quashed as Time-Barred in Absence of Actual FT&TR Reference: ITAT
The assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for AY 2020-21 on 08.01.2021, declaring a total income of Rs. 5,41,98,020 and claiming carry forward of losses amounting to Rs. 1,14,76,791. The return was selected for complete scrutiny, inter alia, for verification of foreign financial interest. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 143(3) read with section 144B on 28.03.2023, determining total income at Rs. 84,527,103.
Before the NFAC, the assessee raised a specific objection that the assessment was barred by limitation, contending that the statutory time limit expired on 30.09.2022. The NFAC accepted the contention and quashed the assessment. Aggrieved, the Revenue preferred an appeal before the ITAT.
Issue Before ITAT: Whether the assessment framed on 28.03.2023 was within limitation on the ground that time stood extended due to an alleged reference for exchange of information with Singapore tax authorities under Explanation 1(x) to section 153 of the Income-tax Act.
ITAT's Decision: The Tribunal held that no evidence was placed on record to show that any actual reference for exchange of information had been made by the competent authority to the Singapore tax authorities. It was observed that the documents relied upon by the Revenue merely showed a proposal and internal correspondence seeking approval, and not a confirmed reference. The conditions of Explanation 1(x) to section 153 were not satisfied and no extension of limitation was available.
Since the assessment ought to have been completed by 30.09.2022 and was instead framed on 28.03.2023, it was rightly held to be barred by limitation. The Revenue’s appeal was dismissed and the quashing of assessment was upheld.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








