Maintenance Charges of Courier Tracking Software, allowable as revenue expenditure and does not amount to Royalty

Maintenance Charges of Courier Tracking Software, allowable as revenue expenditure and does not amount to Royalty

Maintenance Charges of Courier Tracking Software, allowable as revenue expenditure and does not amount to Royalty In M/s. World Courier (India) Pvt. …

authorA2ZBimal JaindateAug 16, 2021
Last update on Aug 16, 2021

Maintenance Charges of Courier Tracking Software, allowable as revenue expenditure and does not amount to Royalty

In M/s. World Courier (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 7(1)(2), Bengaluru [ITA Nos. 1727, 1577/Bang/2017 dated August 11, 2021], M/s. World Courier (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“the Appellant”) has filed an appeal against order dated April 24, 2017 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (“CIT(A)”) on the issue whether Revenue authorities were justified in disallowing sum paid by the Appellant as software maintenance charges to its overseas group companies by invoking section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”). The Assessing Officer (“AO”) relying on the decision in CIT and Anr. v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. [345 ITR 495 (Karn) dated October 15, 2011] disallowed the claim of maintenance charges in the income tax return of the Appellant on the ground that payment in the form of software maintenance charges was in the nature of royalty as it was the payment for a right to use the software and therefore is taxable in India. The Hon’ble Income Tax Tribunal, Bangalore (“ITAT”) held that payments for computer software sold/licenced on a CD/other physical media cannot be classed as a royalty because the end-user only gets the right to use computer software under a non- exclusive licence, ensuring the owner continues to retain ownership under section 14(b) read with sub-section 14(a) (i)-(vii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Further, reliance was placed on the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, [Civil Appeal Nos. 8733 and 8734/2018 dated March 02, 2021] where in the matter was remanded to the AO to examine the terms of the agreement under which right was granted to the Appellant in the light of the provisions of the Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (“DTAA”) as to whether the same would amount to royalty. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

About Author

A2ZBimal Jain

Chartered Accountant

CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468
Up Next

Loading suggestions…