Order dismissing appeal without assigning necessary reasons not sustainable and is cryptic in nature

Order dismissing appeal without assigning necessary reasons not sustainable and is cryptic in nature The Hon’ble Patna High Court in Pankaj Sharma vs…

Order dismissing appeal without assigning necessary reasons not sustainable and is cryptic in nature
The Hon’ble Patna High Court in Pankaj Sharma vs. UOI & Ors. [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7431 dated June 01, 2021] set aside the order dismissing the appeal of the assessee passed by the Revenue Department, on the ground that the same is cryptic in nature as it does not contain the reasons necessarily required for making the order self-explainable and/or comprehensible. Held that, the Appellate Authority, summarily dismissed the appeal without assigning any cogent reason, which is seriously prejudicing the assessee’s cause and case.
Facts:
This petition has been filed by Pankaj Sharma (“the Petitioner”), against the Order-in-Appeal (“OIA”) dated January 28, 2021, (“Impugned order”) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Taxes (Appeal) (“the Respondent”) dismissing the Petitioner’s appeal, only on the ground that the Petitioner has not submitted the certified copy of the Order-in-Original (“OIO”) dated March 06, 2020 on time, which was passed against the demand notice in Form GST DRC-07 dated March 06, 2020 levying tax, interest and penalty of INR 19,81,531/- for the period April 2018 to March 2019.
Issue:
Whether the Respondent was correct in dismissing the appeal filed by the Petitioner for non-submission of the certified copy of the OIO on time, by the Petitioner?
Held:
The Hon’ble Patna High Court in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7431 decided on June 01, 2021 held as under:
- Noted that, the Petitioner’s appeal was dismissed only on the ground that the Petitioner did not submit the certified copy of the OIO on time.
- Observed that, the Respondent summarily dismissed the appeal without assigning any cogent reason, which seriously prejudicing the Petitioner cause and case.
- Further noted that, the Petitioner has already deposited 100% of amount making the appeal mature to be heard on merits.
- Held that, the Impugned order passed by the Respondent is cryptic in nature, and needs to be set aside only on the ground that it does not even contain the reasons necessarily required for making the order self-explainable and/or comprehensible.
- Set aside the Impugned order and remanded back the matter to the Respondent and directed the Petitioner to appear before the Respondent through digital mode due to current Pandemic, if possible.
- Further directed the Respondent to grant opportunity to the Petitioner to place on record all essential documents and materials, decide the appeal on merits expeditiously, within a period of 2 months, in compliance of the principles of natural justice and to deal with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch.
- (1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such person.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









