Reassessment Invalid for Denial of Effective Hearing Under Section 148A: HC:

Reassessment Invalid for Denial of Effective Hearing Under Section 148A: HC A partnership firm in the construction business declared an income of Rs. 58.66 lakh for the assessment year 2018-19. On March 21, 2022, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued a sudden show-cause notice, demanding a detailed explanation by March 28. Given the short window and the need to dig through old files, the firm officially requested an adjournment on March 26 via the tax portal. They even received an automated email acknowledging the request. However, the AO ignored it entirely. On March 30, the officer passed an order claiming that Rs. 1.42 crore had escaped tax, falsely stating in the official record that the firm had never bothered to respond or ask for more time.

Also Read

Cash Deposits from Business Sales Cannot Be Taxed as Unexplained: ITAT

Issue Raised: Does a reassessment order remain valid if the tax officer ignores a documented request for more time and fails to give the taxpayer a fair chance to be heard? HC Held: The High Court threw out the reassessment order and the subsequent tax notice, ruling that the department had committed a clear "breach of natural justice". The Court noted that the timeframe given to the firm was practically impossible, especially considering the holidays and the complexity of the records required.

Also Read

Two Separate GST Assessment Orders Cannot Cover Same Discrepancies and Taxpayer: HC

The Judges emphasised that the right to a hearing isn't just a "procedural formality" or a box to be checked. It must be a real and effective opportunity. By passing an order while an adjournment request was still pending on the system, the AO had effectively silenced the taxpayer. The Court refused to even look at the merits of the alleged tax evasion, focusing instead on the flawed process. The case was sent back to the AO for a fresh start, with strict orders to provide a proper hearing and pass a new order within 12 weeks. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below