ROC Cracks Down on Company and Directors Over SBO Disclosure Norms Violation:
ROC Chhattisgarh has imposed a Rs 3 lakh penalty on the company and its two directors for failing to identify and disclose Significant Beneficial Owners (SBO).
Failure to Identify Beneficial Owners Lands Company Trouble
Saloni Kumari
Apr 5, 2026
Premium
ROC Cracks Down on Company and Directors Over SBO Disclosure Norms Violation
ROC Chhattisgarh has imposed a Rs 3 lakh penalty on the company and its two directors for failing to identify and disclose Significant Beneficial Owners (SBO).
Also Read
MCA Issues FAQs on Registration of Foreign Companies and Indian SubsidiariesROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22Company and Directors Face Penalty for Not Filing Declaration within 180 Days of Incorporation: ROC
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts