ROC Fines Company and Directors For Not Operating from Its Registered Office Address:

ROC Bangalore imposed a Rs 1.5 lakh penalty on company and its directors for failing to operate from and update its registered office address.
Rs 1.5 Lakh Penalty Imposed on Company

ROC Fines Company and Directors For Not Operating from Its Registered Office Address
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Bangalore, has levied a penalty of Rs 1.50 lakh on the company, Norte Technologies India Private Limited and its two directors for violating Section 12(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
In accordance with the physical verification and records available with the Registrar, it was found that the company was not operating from its registered office address. Moreover, if there was a change in the registered address, the company should have informed the Registrar of Companies (ROC) about the same; however, the company did not. This non-compliance violates Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013, making the company and its directors liable for penalties under Section 454 of the same Act.
Considering the same, a penalty of Rs 50,000 has been imposed on the company, Norte Technologies India Private Limited and Rs 1 lakh on its two directors, Praveen Surendiran and Sree Kumar Sundaramoor Thy (Rs 50,000 on each). They have been directed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the stated default within 90 days of receiving the order.
Furthermore, if the company is not satisfied with the present order, it can challenge the same by filing an appeal in writing before the Regional Director, RD Bangalore, within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2487My Recent Articles
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.39 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition After Main Director’s DeathPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Contest Rs 44.16 Lakh Addition After Finding No Decision on MeritsPremium
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








