ROC Imposes Rs 37.5 thousand Penalty for Failure to Maintain Functional Registered Office:

ROC Imposes Rs 37.5 thousand Penalty for Failure to Maintain Functional Registered Office

The ROC has imposed a penalty on Company and its Directors for violating Section 12(1) of the Companies Act, as the registered office was incapable of receiving and acknowledging official communications.

Undelivered Postal Communications Amount to Statutory Violation

authorSaloni KumaridateMay 31, 2026
Last update on May 31, 2026
ROC Imposes Rs 37.5 thousand Penalty for Failure to Maintain Functional Registered Office The Registrar of Companies, Mumbai (ROC), has received Form DIR-12 filed by Karmic Stock Broking Private Limited with respect to the removal of one of the directors under Section 169, and the ROC issued a clarification letter regarding the same and dispatched the copy to the registered office of the company, which was returned by postal authorities marking it as unclaimed by the addressee. Later, on 24th March, 2026, a show cause notice was issued to the company for default of Section 12(1).
ITAT Orders Fresh Review of Brought-Forward Losses and TDS Credit Claims
On representation, the company argued that a postal remark claiming the addressee as absent cannot automatically lead to a violation of section 12(1) and submitted that directors directly manage office operations and also the ongoing construction at the registered office restricted the office access, and hence, it was pleaded that these temporary situations could not be construed as non-maintenance under Section 12.
GST Authorities Drop Rs 8.70 Crore Demand Against Urban Company Limited
On May 2, 2026, an inspection was conducted, which revealed that the office premises remain closed. The registrar held that the Company has failed to produce evidence that would have been convincing enough to show that the registered office is operational and capable of receiving official communications. [related id="422227."] The registrar held that the Company has failed to maintain the registered office and, after exercising power under Section 454 levied a penalty under Section 12(8) of Rs 7500 on Karmic Stock Broking Private Limited and Rs 7500 on each director, namely Mr Sanjiv V Dhami, Mr Arvind L Jain, Mr Tarun Dhami Hiralal and Mr Kamini Sanjiv Dhami, amounting to a total penalty of Rs 37.5 thousand. The company and the directors have been directed to rectify the default and pay the penalty within 90 days from receipt of the order, failing which consequences under Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013 may follow.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2433
Up Next

Loading suggestions…