ROC Mumbai Penalises Director for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Under Companies Act:

ROC imposed a penalty on a director for incorrectly filing Form AOC-4 by failing to disclose the company’s subsidiary and consolidated financial statements requirement.
ROC Penalises Director for Filing Lapse

ROC Mumbai Penalises Director for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Under Companies Act
The director of the company was penalised by the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Mumbai-I, for furnishing incorrect information in Form AOC-4 under the Companies Act, 2013. The fine amount is Rs. 10,000.
The company filed its AOC-4 form on 25th October 2024 as per the ROC order. Therefore, the company had a subsidiary and it had to file consolidated financial statements through Form AOC-4 CFS. But when filling out the form, the company made a mistake and answered 'No' in the relevant section of the form instead of 'Yes'.
The ROC noted that the form was digitally signed and certified by the director. Under Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, the authorised signatory is responsible for ensuring the correctness of the information and attachments submitted in electronic forms.
On 11th May, 2026, the company was issued a show cause notice under section 454 read with section 450 of the Companies Act 2013, and the reply was filed by the director on 25th May, 2026.
The noticee did not request any personal or virtual hearing and the adjudicating officer also held that there was no need to hold a hearing in the matter. The ROC, after perusing the application and the records found that the incorrect filing resulted in the violation of rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and fees) rules, 2014.
The form was approved under the Straight Through Processing (STP) system, and hence, the incorrect information remained on record. The ROC found the director liable for the default and the penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed under section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1559My Recent Articles
- ITAT Denies Section 54 Exemption Claim Made During Reassessment, Upholds LTCG AdditionPremium
- ITAT Upholds Tax Recognition of Dayabhaga HUF, Deletes Rs 27.40 Lakh AdditionPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 54.03 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition, Cites Lack of EvidencePremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Failure to Dispose of Objections Before AssessmentPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 1.16 Crore Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition, Dismisses Revenue AppealPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts









