ROC Mumbai Penalises Director for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Under Companies Act:

ROC Mumbai Penalises Director for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Under Companies Act

ROC imposed a penalty on a director for incorrectly filing Form AOC-4 by failing to disclose the company’s subsidiary and consolidated financial statements requirement.

ROC Penalises Director for Filing Lapse

authorVanshika vermadateMay 29, 2026
Last update on May 29, 2026
ROC Mumbai Penalises Director for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Under Companies Act The director of the company was penalised by the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Mumbai-I, for furnishing incorrect information in Form AOC-4 under the Companies Act, 2013. The fine amount is Rs. 10,000.
ROC Mumbai Penalises Company, Directors for Improper Maintenance of Meeting Minutes
The company filed its AOC-4 form on 25th October 2024 as per the ROC order. Therefore, the company had a subsidiary and it had to file consolidated financial statements through Form AOC-4 CFS. But when filling out the form, the company made a mistake and answered 'No' in the relevant section of the form instead of 'Yes'. The ROC noted that the form was digitally signed and certified by the director. Under Rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, the authorised signatory is responsible for ensuring the correctness of the information and attachments submitted in electronic forms.
ROC Fines Company and Director Over Filing Error Under Companies Act
On 11th May, 2026, the company was issued a show cause notice under section 454 read with section 450 of the Companies Act 2013, and the reply was filed by the director on 25th May, 2026. The noticee did not request any personal or virtual hearing and the adjudicating officer also held that there was no need to hold a hearing in the matter. The ROC, after perusing the application and the records found that the incorrect filing resulted in the violation of rule 8(3) of the Companies (Registration Offices and fees) rules, 2014.
No Penalty Against Company as ROC Drops Proceedings for Non-Appointment of Independent Directors
The form was approved under the Straight Through Processing (STP) system, and hence, the incorrect information remained on record. The ROC found the director liable for the default and the penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed under section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.

About Author

LinkedIn

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1559
Up Next

Loading suggestions…