Same Day Hearing Not Valid Opportunity; GST Order Set Aside by HC:

Same Day Hearing Not Valid Opportunity; GST Order Set Aside by HC

Court rules personal hearing must be meaningful; same-day hearing after reply is invalid

Personal hearing requires prior notice; same-day process held procedurally unfair

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 25, 2026
Last update on Apr 25, 2026
Same-Day Hearing Not Valid Opportunity; GST Order Set Aside by HC The petitioner, M/s Poddar Ispat Pvt. Ltd., challenged a GST demand order dated 26.12.2025 along with related show cause notices. The core grievance was that the department failed to grant a meaningful opportunity of personal hearing as mandated under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. The Department had issued a show cause notice requiring a reply, but did not separately notify any date for personal hearing. When the petitioner submitted its written reply, the authority recorded that the petitioner was “heard” on the very same day and proceeded to pass an adverse order. The petitioner contended that such a procedure deprived it of a fair opportunity to present oral submissions and amounted to a mere procedural formality.
High Court Denies Bail in Rs. 48 Crore Fake GST Invoice Scam
Main Issue: Whether conducting a personal hearing on the same day as filing of reply, without prior notice, satisfies the requirement of Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. HC Held: The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order. It held that the requirement of personal hearing under Section 75(4) is substantive and cannot be reduced to a ritualistic exercise. The court emphasised that a proper hearing necessarily requires prior intimation, enabling the assessee to prepare and present oral arguments effectively. The Court observed that a taxpayer filing a reply cannot reasonably be expected to be ready for oral submissions on the same day.
High Court Declines Writ Against GST Demand; Directs Assessee to Avail Statutory Appeal Remedy
Treating such a situation as a “hearing” renders the process illusory and violative of natural justice. Thus, the Court concluded that the Department's action amounted to a denial of fair opportunity. The matter was remanded with directions to fix a fresh hearing date after due notice and pass a reasoned order in accordance with the law. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below. 

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2192
Up Next

Loading suggestions…