Section 69A Cannot Be Applied When Money or Valuable Items Are Properly Recorded in Books of Account, Says ITAT:

Section 69A Cannot Be Applied When Money or Valuable Items Are Properly Recorded in Books of Account, Says ITAT The ITAT Ahmedabad, in a significant case titled ITO Vs Bharatbhai Bhagwandas Soni, has clarified that the tax authorities can only pursue provisions of Section 69A in a case where money or valuable items are not recorded in the assessee’s books of account. However, in the present, the said condition was not met; hence, the Rs 10.03 crore unexplained money addition was deleted.  Bharatbhai Bhagwandas Soni's case was reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act through a notice dated April 28, 2021. During the reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that an amount of Rs 10.03 crore was credited to the assessee's bank account during the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16 (year under consideration), using NEFT/RTGS transactions, and the assessee had not reflected the same in its income tax return (ITR).

Also Read

No Need to File Two ITRs for AY 2026-27 and Tax Year 2026-27, Clarifies Income Tax Dept Using Kar Setu

Consequently, the assessee was called to explain the source of these credits. In response, the assessee submitted all relevant documents such as bank statements, sales registers, sample sale invoices, ledger accounts, VAT returns and others. However, the AO did not find the assessee's submissions sufficient and treated the entire amount of Rs 10.03 crore as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. Thereafter, the entire Rs 10.03 crore credit was made as an addition to the assessee's taxable income on grounds of a lack of sufficient evidence/documents. The aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before the lower appellate authority, i.e., the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], challenging the Rs 10.03 crore addition, wherein the assessee asserted that "the receipts reflected in the bank account represented business turnover duly recorded in the books of account and, therefore, provisions of section 69A of the Act were not applicable." The CIT(A) found the assessee's submissions relevant and accordingly deleted the impugned addition of Rs 10.03 crore made by the AO under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.

Also Read

ICAI CA Intermediate May 2026: Results Declared on caresults.icai.org; Check Steps to Download and Toppers List

Now, the tax authorities, being dissatisfied with the CIT(A)'s order, filed the present appeal before the ITAT Ahmedabad. When the tribunal examined the case, it noted that the assessee had furnished all the relevant documents proving the source of the Rs 10.03 crore credits in question; however, the concerned tax authorities, without conducting any independent enquiry or bringing any adverse material on record, held the evidence insufficient and treated the entire credit as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Act merely on the ground that certain further details were not furnished. Such a behaviour is unsustainable under the law. It was further highlighted by the tribunal that the provisions of Section 69A can only be applied to a case when money or valuable items are not recorded in the assessee’s books of account. However, in the present, the assessee had explicitly recorded the credits in the books and shown them as business receipts. Based on the aforementioned findings, the tribunal quashed the impugned Rs 10.03 crore and sustained the CIT(A)'s ruling. The appeal is dismissed.