Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere with Allahabad HC Ruling in District Cooperative Bank’s GST Dispute:

Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere with Allahabad HC Ruling in District Cooperative Bank’s GST Dispute

Apex Court refused to interfere under Article 136 and dismissed the District Cooperative Bank’s SLP challenging the Allahabad High Court’s judgment in a GST dispute.

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP in District Cooperative Bank GST Case, Upholds Allahabad HC Ruling

authorMeetu KumaridateDec 17, 2025
Last update on Dec 17, 2025
Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere with Allahabad HC Ruling in District Cooperative Bank’s GST Dispute The District Cooperative Bank Ltd. approached the Supreme Court by filing a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution, challenging the final judgment dated 29.07.2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Central Excise Appeal. The dispute arose against the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Meerut-I. The Special Leave Petition was listed for hearing along with interlocutory applications seeking exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing an official translation. The matter was heard by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court on 12.12.2025
Supreme Court Advises Hybrid Hearings Amid Prevailing Weather Conditions
Question of Law: Whether the Supreme Court should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution to interfere with the Allahabad High Court’s judgment in the GST dispute involving the District Cooperative Bank Ltd.
SC: Only Income Directly From Long-Term Finance Qualifies for Section 36(1)(viii) Deduction; NCDC Appeals Rejected
Apex Court Held: The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court. The Court held that no good ground was made out for exercising its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Thus, the SLP was dismissed. All pending applications, including the interlocutory applications seeking exemptions, were also disposed of. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2255
Up Next

Loading suggestions…