AAR Clarifies GST Treatment on Corpus Fund Collected by Apartment Owners’ Association:

Authority rules that corpus contributions collected by RWA for capital expenditure constitute supply and GST implications must be examined under the Rs. 7,500 exemption threshold
AAR: Corpus Fund Collected by RWA May Attract GST Subject to Rs. 7,500 Exemption

AAR Clarifies GST Treatment on Corpus Fund Collected by Apartment Owners’ Association
M/s Apartment Owners Association of Raj Lake View, a resident welfare association registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, sought an advance ruling on GST implications of corpus funds collected from its members. The association collects monthly maintenance charges for upkeep of common facilities and proposes to collect additional corpus contributions to build a reserve for future capital expenditure, such as structural repairs, repainting, and replacement of capital assets.
The applicant sought clarification on the following issue.
Issue Before AAR: Whether corpus funds collected by an apartment owners’ association from its members for future capital expenditure constitute a “supply” under GST law and whether such collections are eligible for exemption under Entry No. 77 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
AAR Ruled: The Authority for Advance Ruling observed that under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, activities between an association and its members are treated as a supply. Therefore, when an apartment association collects money from members for maintenance, management, or future common works, it amounts to supply of services. The Authority held that corpus fund contributions meant for future repairs or common facilities cannot be treated as mere deposits outside GST.
However, referring to Entry 77 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), the Authority clarified that contributions collected by such associations may be exempt from GST if the total monthly amount charged per member does not exceed Rs. 7,500. Thus, GST liability depends on whether the monthly contribution crosses this threshold.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2174My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six-Year LimitationPremium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 25.12 Crore Disallowance on Independent Section 36 Deduction ComputationPremium
- ITAT Pune Quashes Reassessment as Notice u/s 148A(d) Travelled Beyond Original AllegationsPremium
- ITAT Deletes PE Addition After Allowing Marketing Fees Paid to Indian SubsidiaryPremium
- ITAT Quashes Second Reassessment After Earlier Proceedings Had Already ConcludedPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts









