Bar u/s 14 of IBC extends to any action of enforcement of any security interest created by corporate debtor, including any action under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

Indian Overseas Bank Vs. M/s RCM Infrastructure Ltd. and another

Supreme Court of India

[Civil Appeal No. 4750 of 2021]

HELD THAT Bar under section 14 IBC extends to any action of enforcement of any security interest created by the corporate debtor, including any action under the SARFAESI Act,2002.

BRIEF FACTS

• In the instant case, the Appellant Bank (before the Hon’ble Court) had extended certain credit facilities to the Corporate Debtor.
• However, consequent upon Corporate Debtor’s inability to repay the dues, the loan account of the Corporate Debtor was declared as a Non-Performing Asset/ NPA on 13.06.2016.
• Subsequently, the Appellant Bank, initiated proceedings in terms of Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, culminating in the Bank’s taking over of the symbolic possession of two secured assets of the Corporate Debtor.
• Thereafter, an e-auction notice came to be issued on 27.09.2018 by the Bank to recover the public money availed by the Corporate Debtor.
• In the meantime, the Corporate Debtor filed a petition under Section 10 IBC before the Hon’ble Adjudicating Authority on 22.10.2018, which was admitted by the Hon’ble Tribunal on 03.01.2019, co-terminus with the notification of a moratorium as per Section 14 of the Code. Notably, in the period prior to said admission, pursuant to the bid issued by the Appellant, successful bidder deposited part sale consideration amount, followed by the remaining 75% (Seventy Five percent) thereof, subsequent to Appellant filing its claim in the Corporate Debtor’s ongoing resolution process.
• Thereafter, while the Banker, on receipt of the entire sale consideration amount, filed its revised claims, former Managing Director of the Corporate Debtor filed an application for setting aside of action sale, carried out pursuant to the Appellant’s SARFAESI proceedings.
• Pertinently, the said action sale was set aside by the Hon’ble Tribunal and even the appeal thereagainst was dismissed by the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal by impugned order/ judgment.
• While dealing with the issue, the Hon’ble outrightly noted the provisions under Section 14 IBC, in particular, that under sub-section (1)(c) thereof to observe, “it is clear that once the CIRP is commenced, there is complete prohibition for any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Corporate Debtor in respect of its property. The words “including any action under the SARFAESI Act” are significant. The legislative intent is clear that after the CIRP is initiated, all actions including any action under the SARFAESI Act to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest are prohibited.” 
• At the same time, while referring to several of its previous decisions, the Hon’ble Court observed, “in view of the provisions of Section 238 of the IBC, the provisions of the IBC would prevail notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force.” 
• While further considering the objection regarding the conclusion of sale proceedings, the Hon’ble Court reiterated the significance of intention of parties and the provisions under Rules 8 and 9 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.
• In fact, while considering the terms of the said provisions/ Rules, the Hon’ble Court noted, “sale would be complete only when the auction purchaser makes the entire payment and the authorised officer, exercising the power of sale, shall issue a certificate of sale of the property in favour of the purchaser…” Accordingly, while dismissing the present appeal, holding that the auction-sale in the instant case was concluded post issuance of moratorium, the Apex Court affirmed, “in view of the provisions of Section 14(1)(c) of the IBC, which have overriding effect over any other law, any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Corporate Debtor in respect of its property including any action under the SARFAESI Act is prohibited.”

DECISION OF SUPREME COURT

• The Hon’ble Supreme Court considered whether a Bank can continue the proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is initiated and moratorium is ordered. The Hon’ble SC made some important findings and observations as under –

 CONCLUSION: the provisions of Section 14(1)(c ) clearly provides that subject to provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3), on the insolvency commencement date, the Adjudicating Authority shall by order declare moratorium for prohibiting all of the following, namely:— (c) any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. It means that once CIRP initiated any action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to foreclose ,recover or enforce any security interest created by Corporate Debtor will be prohibited.

DISCLAIMER:  the case law presented here is only for sharing information and knowledge with the readers. The views are personal and same should not be considered as professional advice. In case of necessity do consult with professionals for more understanding and clarity on subject matter.