Bombay HC: Pre-Consultation Mandatory for Service Tax SCNs Above Rs. 50 Lakh

HC rules that SCNs for service tax demands over 50 lakhs are invalid without mandatory pre-consultation under CBEC Master Circular

High Court: Failure to Hold Pre-Consultation Vitiates Service Tax SCNs

Meetu Kumari | Oct 3, 2025 |

Bombay HC: Pre-Consultation Mandatory for Service Tax SCNs Above Rs. 50 Lakh

Bombay HC: Pre-Consultation Mandatory for Service Tax SCNs Above Rs. 50 Lakh

A batch of writ petitions, including Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., challenged the issuance of Show Cause Notices (SCNs) under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, where service tax demands raised were all above Rs. 50 lakhs. The petitioners argued that these SCNs were issued without holding a mandatory pre-show cause notice consultation as prescribed under CBEC Master Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX dated 10.03.2017 and clarified further in Circular No. 1076/02/2020-CX dated 19.11.2020.

Main Issue: Whether the requirement of pre-consultation is mandatory before the issuance of an SCN under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, for demands above Rs. 50 lakhs, in light of CBEC Circular No. 1053/02/2017-CX and Circular No. 1076/02/2020-CX.

HC’s Decision: The Hon’ble High Court allowed the petitions, holding that pre-show cause notice consultation is mandatory for service tax demands exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs. The Court placed reliance on the explicit language of the CBEC Master Circular dated 10.03.2017, which categorically provides that the Board “has made pre show cause notice consultation… mandatory” for demands above the threshold. It further noted that the 2020 circular reiterated that pre-show cause notice consultation with assessee… is mandatory.”  The Court ruled that non-compliance with this statutory mandate vitiated the initiation of proceedings, and therefore the impugned SCNs were unsustainable.

Thus, the SCNs were quashed, affirming that the failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of pre-consultation constitutes a fatal flaw.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Delhi HC awards 6% interest on VAT refund delayed by over 15 years Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate Fraud ED arrests former RCOM Director Punit Garg in Rs. 40,000 crore bank fraud probe CGST arrests Modasa businessman over Rs. 17.5 crore fake ITC claimView All Posts