Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice:

Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice

Uploading notice only under “Additional Notices” tab held insufficient; matter remanded for fresh adjudication with hearing

High Court quashes GST order for lack of proper service of show cause notice

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 3, 2026
Last update on Feb 3, 2026
Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of the show cause notice The petitioner, Anil Kumar, proprietor of N.S. Super Mart challenged a show cause notice dated 15.12.2023 and the later  order-in-original dated 03.04.2024 passed under the Delhi GST law. The show cause notice proposed a tax demand of Rs. 10.91 lakh on account of alleged excess Input Tax Credit due to GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch, non-reversal of ITC relating to exempt supplies, and ITC claimed from dealers whose registrations were cancelled. The notice, along with reminders, was uploaded only under the “Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal. According to the petitioner, this mode of uploading did not come to his knowledge, resulting in complete absence of awareness of the proceedings. Thus, no reply was filed and the order was ultimately passed ex parte on the ground of non-prosecution, without granting any personal hearing. Main Issue: Whether a show cause notice uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal, without effective service or knowledge to the assessee, can form the basis for passing an ex parte adjudication order raising tax demand. HC Held: The High Court held that mere uploading of a show cause notice and reminders under the “Additional Notices” tab, when the tab itself was not operational or accessible to the petitioner, did not amount to proper or effective service. Relying on its earlier Division Bench decision in Neelgiri Machinery v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Etemad Cargo, the Court found that the petitioner was denied a meaningful opportunity of hearing. The impugned order dated 03.04.2024 was accordingly quashed. The matter was remanded to the tax authority with directions to permit the petitioner to file a reply within four weeks, grant a personal hearing on a specified date, and thereafter pass a reasoned order within three months. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…