Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice

Uploading notice only under “Additional Notices” tab held insufficient; matter remanded for fresh adjudication with hearing

High Court quashes GST order for lack of proper service of show cause notice

Meetu Kumari | Feb 3, 2026 |

Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice

Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of the show cause notice

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, proprietor of N.S. Super Mart challenged a show cause notice dated 15.12.2023 and the later  order-in-original dated 03.04.2024 passed under the Delhi GST law. The show cause notice proposed a tax demand of Rs. 10.91 lakh on account of alleged excess Input Tax Credit due to GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch, non-reversal of ITC relating to exempt supplies, and ITC claimed from dealers whose registrations were cancelled.

The notice, along with reminders, was uploaded only under the “Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal. According to the petitioner, this mode of uploading did not come to his knowledge, resulting in complete absence of awareness of the proceedings. Thus, no reply was filed and the order was ultimately passed ex parte on the ground of non-prosecution, without granting any personal hearing.

Main Issue: Whether a show cause notice uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal, without effective service or knowledge to the assessee, can form the basis for passing an ex parte adjudication order raising tax demand.

HC Held: The High Court held that mere uploading of a show cause notice and reminders under the “Additional Notices” tab, when the tab itself was not operational or accessible to the petitioner, did not amount to proper or effective service. Relying on its earlier Division Bench decision in Neelgiri Machinery v. Commissioner, Delhi GST and Etemad Cargo, the Court found that the petitioner was denied a meaningful opportunity of hearing.

The impugned order dated 03.04.2024 was accordingly quashed. The matter was remanded to the tax authority with directions to permit the petitioner to file a reply within four weeks, grant a personal hearing on a specified date, and thereafter pass a reasoned order within three months.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Delhi HC sets aside GST order passed without proper service of show cause notice CBI Court Sentences Three to 3 Years’ Jail in Rs. 1.18 Crore Excise Duty Rebate Fraud ED arrests former RCOM Director Punit Garg in Rs. 40,000 crore bank fraud probe CGST arrests Modasa businessman over Rs. 17.5 crore fake ITC claim Late Form 10B Can’t Block Charity Exemption When Audit Report Was Already on Record: ITATView All Posts