Bombay HC stayed the demand notice seeking Service Tax from Advocate

  • Home
  • Bombay HC stayed the demand notice seeking Service Tax from Advocate

CA Bimal Jain | Mar 27, 2021 | Views 1835626

Bombay HC stayed the demand notice seeking Service Tax from Advocate

Bombay HC stayed the demand notice seeking Service Tax from Advocate

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Sanjiv Madhusudan Shah v. Assistant Commissioner of Central and Service Tax and ors. [Writ Petition (L) No. 646 of 2021 dated January 12, 2021] has stayed a demand notice issued, seeking to levy service tax upon an Advocate.

Facts:-

Sanjiv Madhusudan Shah (“the Petitioner”), who is an Advocate by profession vide this writ petition has challenged the to show cause cum demand notice dated December 28, 2020 (“SCN”), issued to the Petitioner by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (“CGST”), Mumbai West, seeking to levy service tax upon the Petitioner for the financial year 2014-15.

The Petitioner submitted that the Central Government has issued several exemption notifications whereby services provided by an individual as an advocate or as a partnership firm of Advocates by way of legal services are exempt from the charge of Service Tax. That apart, there is a provision for recovering Service Tax from the service recipient. Ignoring the same, the show cause cum demand notice has been issued mechanically.

Issue:

Whether service tax can be levied on an Advocate?

Held:

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition (L) NO. 646 of 2021 dated January 12, 2021 issued notice to the Assistant Commissioner returnable in eight weeks for seeking response on the matter. Further, as an interim measure granted stay of the SCN until further orders.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button

Join Membership

In case of Any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Non-submission of receipt of electricity bill is not a ground of rejection of application for GST registration GST not applicable on payment of notice pay and allowed ITC on canteen services Anticipatory bail is a statutory right and custodial interrogation is neither warranted nor provided under the CGST Act TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer Hon’ble High Court ordered the GST Authority to reimburse GST paid under the incorrect heading View All Posts

Leave a Reply