CA Found Guilty of professional misconduct; Board imposed penalty of Rs 25,000 for violation:

A written communication with the previous auditor is mandatory under the ICAI Code of Ethics before appointing a tax auditor to ensure ethical compliance.
ICAI Disciplinary Action Against CA for Violation of Professional Ethics in Tax Audit Appointment

CA Found Guilty of professional misconduct; Board imposed penalty of Rs 25,000 for violation
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has recently issued a disciplinary order against a Chartered Accountant over professional misconduct and violation of professional ethics.
The complainant, CA Sunil Kumar, performed the tax audit of M/s Arora Tyres for FY 2015-16. For FY 2016-17, CA Rajendra Agrawal, the Respondent, was appointed as a Tax Auditor of the entity without written communication or a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the previous auditor, which is a violation of Item (8) of Part I of the First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
While the matter was decided to be heard on January 25, 2025, the complainant did not appear before the ICAI's Board of Discipline, but the respondent attended the hearing through a video conference. In the hearing, he admitted that he did not obtain a written NOC from the complainant. The respondent further added that the client had contacted him after the complainant had refused to do the work. He believed formal communication was not very important, as he had a longstanding personal relationship with the complainant.
The board observed that written communication with the previous auditor is mandatory under the ICAI Code of Ethics to ensure ethical compliance. Since he already admitted that he failed to obtain the written communication from the complainant, this clearly shows a violation of professional conduct.
The Board found CA Rajendra Agrawal guilty of professional misconduct under Item (8) of Part I of the First Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Board also imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000 on him for the violation.
About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







