News

The Allahabad High Court sentenced an income tax officer to a week in jail for allowing an outstanding tax demand to remain on the web portal for seven months after it was quashed due to a jurisdictional error.

Refusal to delete Tax Demand on Income Tax Portal: ITO sentenced to Jail for a week by High Court

Judgement

Trust cannot be denied from benefit u/s 11 just because details of registration were not furnished in ITR: ITAT

Provisions of Sec 43B not applicable on service tax when same has not been routed through P&L: ITAT

Assessee has to invoke Section 154 and not Appellate Jurisdiction in case of clerical error: ITAT

Tax authorities cannot decide commercial expediency by putting themselves in arm chair of assessee: ITAT

Notice not served when same is issued on address other than that provided in Form 35: ITAT

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Refusal to delete Tax Demand on Income Tax Portal: ITO sentenced to Jail for a week by High Court

Trust cannot be denied from benefit u/s 11 just because details of registration were not furnished in ITR: ITAT

Provisions of Sec 43B not applicable on service tax when same has not been routed through P&L: ITAT

Assessee has to invoke Section 154 and not Appellate Jurisdiction in case of clerical error: ITAT

Tax authorities cannot decide commercial expediency by putting themselves in arm chair of assessee: ITAT

Notice not served when same is issued on address other than that provided in Form 35: ITAT