Judgement

Hyderabad ITAT quashes Section 271D penalty, holding limitation starts from the Assessing Officer’s reference for penalty proceedings.

ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause Notice

The ITAT remanded the Section 69 unexplained cash credit addition to the AO after the assessee produced a bank statement that was not examined during the original assessment.

ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not Examined

ITAT restores appeal to CIT(A) after finding documentary evidence filed by assessee was not considered.

ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement Cost

ITAT restores appeal to CIT(A), allowing another chance to explain foreign salary and Singapore bank credits.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause Notice

ITAT Remands Section 69 Unexplained Cash Credit Addition After Bank Statement Was Not Examined

ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement Cost

ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition Case

ITAT Holds Miscommunication Between Assessee and Counsel As Sufficient to Warrant Fresh Adjudication

ITAT Holds Cost of Acquisition Cannot Be Taken as Nil Merely Because Old Records Are Unavailable