CBDT instructs for removal of defects of pending appeals before High Courts

CBDT instructs for removal of defects of pending appeals before High Courts F. No. 272/ M-25/2015-(M) Government of India Ministry of Financ

CBDT instructs for removal of defects of pending appeals before High Courts
F. No. 272/ M-25/2015-(M)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board Direct Taxes
Audit &Judicial Division
New Delhi, 7th December, 2018
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax,
Madam/ Sir,
Sub: Non-removal/delay in removal of defects of pending appeals before Honble High Courts reg.
Kindly refer to the above
2. Non-removal/delay in removal of defects in pending appeals before the Honble High Courts is a matter of great concern for the Board. In many cases, Departmental appeals pending before High Courts have been dismissed due to non-removal/delay in removing of defects as pointed out by the Registry of the High Court. The Honble Supreme Court has also started taking serious view of the delay in filing of the SLPs. In some recent case where there was inordinate delay in removing objections at the level of High Courts, Honble Supreme court has directed that officers responsible who failed to remove the objections must he identified & their names be disclosed in affidavits.
3. In this backdrop I am directed to inform the following:
a) PCIT/CIT is personally responsible as per Instruction No. 7 of 2011 to ensure proper filing of appeals in High Courts & consequential follow up action. Proper filing of appeals implies that defects /office objections raised by High Courts Registry, if any, should be promptly removed within 7 days, to ensure that the memorandum of appeal is accepted by Courts Registry & it gets numbered & listed for hearing before the High court. Any lapse in this regard will be viewed seriously,
b) High Court Cell shall take daily updates w.r.t appeals filed on any day & check for any defects/ office objections raised by the Courts Registry. If objections are raised, it shall procure the copy of objections from Standing counsel or the Courts Registry and inform the concerned PCIT/C1T writing to address the defects/ office objections and get then removed within 7 days. High Court Cell shall keep a follow up until the defects/office objections are removed & matter is listed before High Court,
c) The PCIT/CIT shall coordinate with standing counsel and shall ensure that all defects are removed in time.
4. It may be brought in the notice of all officers in your region.
This issues with the approval of Member (A&J).
Abhishek Gautam
DCIT (OSD)
ITJ-1, CBDT
Tel :011-23741832
Source : Itatonline.org
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
CA Deepak Gupta,is Co-founder of Studycafe. He is Microsoft Office Specialist and Corporate Trainer of AI Tools, Microsoft Excel.
He is Finance Influencer having more than 250K followers on Social Media. CA Deepak Gupta, is Having more than 14 plus years of experience, and he has Worked with best brands Like, Hero, Wipro, Ericsson before Starting Studycafe. He has Trained more than 20000 Persons in Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, Power BI, Google Sheet, Google Forms and Other Tools.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.







