CBI Catches Superintendent, CGST Red-handed While Accepting Bribe of Rs. 5 lakh:

CBI caught a CGST Superintendent in Mumbai red-handed while accepting a Rs. 5 lakh bribe, leading to the seizure of unaccounted cash, property documents, and digital evidence.
CBI Arrests CGST Audit Officer in Rs. 17 Lakh Bribery Case

CBI Catches Superintendent, CGST Red-handed While Accepting Bribe of Rs. 5 lakh
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has caught Superintendent, CGST Audit-I, Mumbai red-handed while accepting a bribe of Rs. five lakh from the complainant.
On December 22, 2025, a director of a private company registered a complaint against the Superintendent, CGST. On November 26, 2025, an audit was carried out by the alleged officer on the company owned by the complainant. In the complaint registered, it was asserted that the company's owner (complainant) was threatened by the officer to raise a tax demand amounting to Rs. 98 lakh against his company, and to settle down the issue, he demanded a bribe of Rs. 20 lakh.
After a thorough discussion, the Superintendent, CGST, agreed to accept Rs. 17 lakh; however, he put a condition that he would not remove the entire tax demand from the complainant's company but instead reduce the alleged tax liability. The first instalment of the bribe amount, i.e., Rs. 5 lakh, was scheduled to be delivered on December 22, 2025.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) decided to catch the officer red-handed at the time of accepting the first instalment of the bribe. The CBI conducted searches at the resident location of the accused officer in Mumbai. During the search, they found Rs. 18.30 lakh in cash. When asked the source of the amount, the officer could not explain. They also recovered documents associated with the purchase of two properties, one worth Rs. 40.315 lakh bought in April 2025, and another worth Rs. 32.10 lakh bought in June 2024.
Searches were also carried out at the office of the accused, who is a public servant. During this search, digital evidences were also confiscated, showing that he was preparing an audit report for a private company. The investigation is still ongoing.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







